ArticleZhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery2017
[Construction and biocompatibility
Article in Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To explore the construction and biocompatibility Methods: The electrostatic spinning solution was prepared by dissolving SF and different mass ratio (0, 5%, 10%, 15%, and 20%) of Gr in formic acid solution. The hydrophilia and hydrophobic was analyzed by testing the static contact angle of electrostatic spinning solution of different mass ratio of Gr. Gr-SF nanofilms with different mass ratio (0, 5%, 10%, 15%, and 20%, as groups A, B, C, D, and E, respectively) were constructed by electrospinning technology. The structure of nanofilms were observed by optical microscope and scanning electron microscope; electrochemical performance of nanofilms were detected by cyclic voltammetry at electrochemical workstation; the porosity of nanofilms were measured by n-hexane substitution method, and the permeability were observed; L929 cells were used to evaluate the cytotoxicity of nanofilms Results: The static contact angle measurement confirmed that the hydrophilia of Gr-SF electrospinning solution was decreased by increasing the mass ratio of Gr. Light microscope and scanning electron microscopy showed that Gr-SF nanofilms had nanofiber structure, Gr particles could be dispersed uniformly in the membrane, and the increasing of mass ratio of Gr could lead to the aggregation of particles. The porosity measurement showed that the Gr-SF nanofilms had high porosity (>65%). With the increasing of mass ratio of Gr, the porosity and conductivity of Gr-SF nanofilm increased gradually, the value in the group A was significantly lower than those in groups C, D, and E ( Conclusion: The Gr-SF nanofilm with mass ratio of Gr less than 10% have proper hydrophilia, conductivity, porosity, and other physical and chemical properties, and have good biocompatibility
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.