Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29798559›Full record

ArticleZhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery2017

[Effectiveness analysis of surgical treatment of ipsilateral femoral neck fracture and subtrochanteric fracture].

Qi Sun, Gen Li, Wei Ge, Guanghua Lu, Ming Cai, Shaohua Li

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Diagnostic Value of Magnetic Resonance (MR) Combined with Computed Tomography (CT) in Patients with Stress Injury of Femoral Neck.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2020
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Qi SunDepartment of Orthopedics, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200072, P.R.China.
Gen LiDepartment of Orthopedics, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200072, P.R.China.
Wei GeDepartment of Orthopedics, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200072, P.R.China.
Guanghua LuDepartment of Orthopedics, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200072, P.R.China.
Ming CaiDepartment of Orthopedics, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200072, P.R.China.cmdoctor@tongji.edu.cn.
Shaohua LiDepartment of Orthopedics, Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital, Tongji University, School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200072, P.R.China.tjdxsq@tongji.edu.cn.
Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital · CNTongji University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To discuss the effectiveness of intramedullary nail fixation with selective cable wiring in the treatment of ipsilateral femoral neck fracture and subtrochanteric fracture. Methods: Between June 2012 and December 2015, a total of 19 patients with ipsilateral femoral neck fracture and subtrochanteric fracture underwent closed reduction of femoral neck fracture and intramedullary nail fixation combined with selective cable wiring. There were 5 males and 14 females with a median age of 52 years (range, 35-77 years). The cause of injury included traffic accident injury in 17 cases and falling injury in 2 cases. According to Garden classification for femoral neck fractures, 7 cases were rated as type Ⅱ, 8 as type Ⅲ, and 4 as type Ⅳ. Femoral subtrochanteric fractures were classified by Seinsheimer classification, with 9 cases as type Ⅱ, 5 as type Ⅲ, 3 as type Ⅳ, and 2 as type V. The interval from injury to operation ranged from 2 to 7 days with an average of 3.7 days. Results: The operation time was 58-125 minutes (mean, 82.4 minutes) and the intraoperative blood loss was 225-725 mL (mean, 289.5 mL). All incisions achieved healing by first intention and no early complication such as infection was observed. All patients were followed up 12-18 months (mean, 13.9 months). At 1 month after operation, the tip apex distance was 9-23 mm (mean, 15.2 mm). All patients achieved bone union with the healing time of 18-42 weeks (mean, 27.4 weeks). One case of hip varus and femoral neck re-displacement (femoral neck shaft angle was 122°) occurred at 3 months after operation, which achieved bone union at 42 weeks after operation. Five patients complained of postoperative pain with the visual analogue scale (VAS) score of 1-3 (mean, 1.8), which did not influence normal life. A total of 16 patients recovered preoperative hip function. During follow-up, no fracture nonunion, femoral head necrosis, implant failure, screw cut-out, and loosening of cable wiring was observed. The Harris hip score (HSS) was 72-92 (mean, 82.8) at last follow-up and 15 patients (78.9%) achieved good hip function. Conclusion: Intramedullary nail fixation combined with selective cable wiring was effective in the treatment of ipsilateral femoral neck fracture and subtrochanteric fracture.

Indexed as

Bone NailsBone ScrewsFracture Fixation, IntramedullaryAdultAgedFemaleFemoral FracturesFemoral Neck FracturesFracture Fixation, InternalHip FracturesHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment Outcomecable wiringfemoral neck fractureinternal fixationintramedullary nailSubtrochanteric fracture

Identifiers

PMID29798559
PMCPMC8458421
OpenAlexW2988296966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.