Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29797825›Full record

ReviewAsia-Pacific journal of ophthalmology (Philadelphia, Pa.)

Plus Disease in Retinopathy of Prematurity: More Than Meets the ICROP?

Layla Ghergherehchi, Sang Jin Kim, J Peter Campbell, Susan Ostmo, R V Paul Chan, Michael F Chiang

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Asia-Pacific journal of ophthalmology (Philadelphia, Pa.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Artificial Intelligence in Retinopathy of Prematurity Diagnosis.Translational vision science & technology · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Layla GhergherehchiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Sang Jin KimDepartment of Ophthalmology, Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
J Peter CampbellDepartment of Ophthalmology, Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Susan OstmoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
R V Paul ChanDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Illinois Eye and Ear Infirmary, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Michael F ChiangDepartment of Ophthalmology, Casey Eye Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Oregon Health & Science University · USUniversity of Illinois Chicago · US

Funding

Proteomics CoreP30EY010572 · NEI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI TED S ACOTT · 1995 to 2026
$19.4M
Translational Core for Therapeutic and Diagnostic DevelopmentP30EY001792 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI MCANANY, JAMES JASON · 1985 to 2025
$14.8M
Clinical and Genetic Analysis of Retinopathy of PrematurityR01EY019474 · NEI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI CAMPBELL, JOHN PETER · 2010 to 2020
$7.0M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY001792NEI NIH HHS P30 EY010572NEI NIH HHS R01 EY019474
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), a vasoproliferative retinal disease affecting premature infants, is a leading cause of childhood blindness throughout the world. Plus disease, defined as venous dilatation and arteriolar tortuosity within the posterior retinal vessels greater than or equal to that of a standard published photograph, is the most critical finding in identifying treatment-requiring ROP. Despite an internationally accepted definition of plus disease, there is significant variability in diagnostic process and outcome, producing variable levels of reported intra- and interexpert agreement. Several potential explanations for poor agreement have been proposed, including attention to undefined vascular features such as venous tortuosity, focus on narrower or wider field of view, unfamiliarity with digital images, the magnification and apparent severity of the standard photograph, and cut-off point differences among experts as to the level of tortuosity and dilation sufficient for "plus disease" along a continuum. Moreover, differences in diagnostic consistency among groups of experts separated both geographically and chronologically have been reported. These findings have implications for clinical care, research, and education, and highlight the need for a more precise definition of plus disease and objective diagnostic methods for ROP.

Indexed as

Diagnostic Techniques, OphthalmologicalInfant, PrematureDiagnostic ImagingHumansInfant, NewbornRetinopathy of Prematurityartificial intelligencedeep learningdiagnostic imagingplus diseaseretinaretinopathy of prematurity

Identifiers

PMID29797825
PMCPMC7880619
OpenAlexW2804574908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.