Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29797809›Full record

ReviewAnnals of laboratory medicine2018

Reducing Test Utilization in Hospital Settings: A Narrative Review.

Renuka S Bindraban, Maarten J Ten Berg, Christiana A Naaktgeboren, Mark H H Kramer, Wouter W Van Solinge, Prabath W B Nanayakkara

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of laboratory medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07629219 (Optimization of Low-Value Medical Testing Practices in Hospitalized Patients in Argentina), which is not on this map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07629219 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Optimization of Low-Value Medical Testing Practices in Hospitalized Patients in Argentina (OPTIMIZAR)

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospital Italiano de Buenos AiresRan2025 to 2025Enrolled600ConditionsLow-Value Care, Costs and Cost Analysis, Implementation Science, Public HealthArmsOPTIMIZAR Multicomponent Diagnostic Stewardship Bundle
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Strategies to reduce the use of low-value medical tests in primary care: a systematic review.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Rationalising blood tests in a resource-limited emergency unit: A quality improvement project.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center) · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Huisarts en wetenschap · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Renuka S BindrabanDepartments of Clinical Chemistry and Haematology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Maarten J Ten BergDepartments of Clinical Chemistry and Haematology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Christiana A NaaktgeborenDepartments of Clinical Chemistry and Haematology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Mark H H KramerSection Acute Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Wouter W Van SolingeDepartments of Clinical Chemistry and Haematology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Prabath W B NanayakkaraSection Acute Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. p.nanayakkara@vumc.nl.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1555-3682

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStudies addressing the appropriateness of laboratory testing have revealed approximately 20% overutilization. We conducted a narrative review to (1) describe current interventions aimed at reducing unnecessary laboratory testing, specifically in hospital settings, and (2) provide estimates of their efficacy in reducing test order volume and improving patient-related clinical outcomes.

methodsThe PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health-Health Technology Assessment databases were searched for studies describing the effects of interventions aimed at reducing unnecessary laboratory tests. Data on test order volume and clinical outcomes were extracted by one reviewer, while uncertainties were discussed with two other reviewers. Because of the heterogeneity of interventions and outcomes, no meta-analysis was performed.

resultsEighty-four studies were included. Interventions were categorized into educational, (computerized) provider order entry [(C)POE], audit and feedback, or other interventions. Nearly all studies reported a reduction in test order volume. Only 15 assessed sustainability up to two years. Patient-related clinical outcomes were reported in 45 studies, two of which found negative effects.

conclusionsInterventions from all categories have the potential to reduce unnecessary laboratory testing, although long-term sustainability is questionable. Owing to the heterogeneity of the interventions studied, it is difficult to conclude which approach was most successful, and for which tests. Most studies had methodological limitations, such as the absence of a control arm. Therefore, well-designed, controlled trials using clearly described interventions and relevant clinical outcomes are needed.

Indexed as

Laboratories, HospitalDatabases, FactualDiagnostic Tests, RoutineReproducibility of ResultsInterventionLaboratory testingLaboratory utilizationReductionUnnecessary laboratory testingUnnecessary laboratory utilization

Identifiers

PMID29797809
PMCPMC5973913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.