Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29797762›Full record

ArticleMolecular oncology2018

A combined tissue-engineered/in silico signature tool patient stratification in lung cancer.

Claudia Göttlich, Meik Kunz, Cornelia Zapp, Sarah L Nietzer, Heike Walles, Thomas Dandekar, Gudrun Dandekar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Cat-E: A comprehensive web tool for exploring cancer targeting strategies.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Claudia GöttlichTissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Germany.
Meik KunzDepartment of Bioinformatics, Biocenter, University of Wuerzburg, Germany.
Cornelia ZappInstitute for Pharmaceutics and Molecular Biotechnology (IPMB), University of Heidelberg, Germany.
Sarah L NietzerTissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Germany.
Heike WallesTissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Germany.
Thomas DandekarDepartment of Bioinformatics, Biocenter, University of Wuerzburg, Germany.
Gudrun DandekarTissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Germany.
Universitätsklinikum Würzburg · DEEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory · DEFraunhofer Institute for Silicate Research · DEHeidelberg Pharma (Germany) · DEUniversity of Würzburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patient-tailored therapy based on tumor drivers is promising for lung cancer treatment. For this, we combined in vitro tissue models with in silico analyses. Using individual cell lines with specific mutations, we demonstrate a generic and rapid stratification pipeline for targeted tumor therapy. We improve in vitro models of tissue conditions by a biological matrix-based three-dimensional (3D) tissue culture that allows in vitro drug testing: It correctly shows a strong drug response upon gefitinib (Gef) treatment in a cell line harboring an EGFR-activating mutation (HCC827), but no clear drug response upon treatment with the HSP90 inhibitor 17AAG in two cell lines with KRAS mutations (H441, A549). In contrast, 2D testing implies wrongly KRAS as a biomarker for HSP90 inhibitor treatment, although this fails in clinical studies. Signaling analysis by phospho-arrays showed similar effects of EGFR inhibition by Gef in HCC827 cells, under both 2D and 3D conditions. Western blot analysis confirmed that for 3D conditions, HSP90 inhibitor treatment implies different p53 regulation and decreased MET inhibition in HCC827 and H441 cells. Using in vitro data (western, phospho-kinase array, proliferation, and apoptosis), we generated cell line-specific in silico topologies and condition-specific (2D, 3D) simulations of signaling correctly mirroring in vitro treatment responses. Networks predict drug targets considering key interactions and individual cell line mutations using the Human Protein Reference Database and the COSMIC database. A signature of potential biomarkers and matching drugs improve stratification and treatment in KRAS-mutated tumors. In silico screening and dynamic simulation of drug actions resulted in individual therapeutic suggestions, that is, targeting HIF1A in H441 and LKB1 in A549 cells. In conclusion, our in vitro tumor tissue model combined with an in silico tool improves drug effect prediction and patient stratification. Our tool is used in our comprehensive cancer center and is made now publicly available for targeted therapy decisions.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsCell Line, TumorDrug Screening Assays, AntitumorGefitinibHumansLung NeoplasmsMolecular Targeted TherapyMutationPrecision MedicineSwineTissue EngineeringAntineoplastic AgentsGefitinib3D lung tumor modelBoolean signaling networkchemoresistanceHSP90 inhibitorin silico drug screening toolKRAS mutation signature

Identifiers

PMID29797762
PMCPMC6068345
OpenAlexW2804324327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.