Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29797548›Full record

ArticleGenes, brain, and behavior2019

Conservation of the behavioral and transcriptional response to social experience among Drosophilids.

R K Shultzaberger, S J Johnson, J Wagner, K Ha, T A Markow, R J Greenspan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, brain, and behavior, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Is variation in female aggressiveness acrossProceedings. Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Behavioral and environmental contributions to drosophilid social networks.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The neuroscience and genomics of social behavior.Genes, brain, and behavior · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

R K ShultzabergerKavli Institute of Brain and Mind, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California.ORCID 0000-0002-4586-0659
S J JohnsonKavli Institute of Brain and Mind, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California.
J WagnerKavli Institute of Brain and Mind, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California.
K HaKavli Institute of Brain and Mind, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California.
T A MarkowLaboratorio Nacional de Genomica de la Biodiversidad, Centro de Investigacion y de Estudios Avanzados-Irapuato, Guanajuato, Mexico.
R J GreenspanKavli Institute of Brain and Mind, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California.

Funding

A Drosophila Model for Williams Syndrome Cognitive ProcessingR21EY020629 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI GREENSPAN, RALPH J · 2010 to 2010
$245k
NEI NIH HHS R21 EY020629NIH HHS 1R21EY020629-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While social experience has been shown to significantly alter behaviors in a wide range of species, comparative studies that uniformly measure the impact of a single experience across multiple species have been lacking, limiting our understanding of how plastic traits evolve. To address this, we quantified variations in social feeding behaviors across 10 species of Drosophilids, tested the effect of altering rearing context on these behaviors (reared in groups or in isolation) and correlated observed behavioral shifts to accompanying transcriptional changes in the heads of these flies. We observed significant variability in the extent of aggressiveness, the utilization of social cues during food search, and social space preferences across species. The sensitivity of these behaviors to rearing experience also varied: socially naive flies were more aggressive than their socialized conspecifics in some species, and more reserved or identical in others. Despite these differences, the mechanism of socialization appeared to be conserved within the melanogaster subgroup as species could cross-socialize each other, and the transcriptional response to social exposure was significantly conserved. The expression levels of chemosensory-perception genes often varied between species and rearing conditions, supporting a growing body of evidence that behavioral evolution is driven by the differential regulation of this class of genes. The clear differences in behavioral responses to socialization observed in Drosophilids make this an ideal system for continued studies on the genetic basis and evolution of socialization and behavioral plasticity.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularSocial BehaviorTranscriptomeAnimalsDrosophilaFeeding BehaviorbehaviorchemosensationDrosophilidsevolutionexperiencegene expressioninterspecies variationneurogenomicssocial interactionssocialization

Identifiers

PMID29797548
PMCPMC7379240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.