Observational studyHealth services research2018
The Development of a Conceptual Framework and Preliminary Item Bank for Childbirth-Specific Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.
Observational study in Health services research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Patient-Centered Outcomes Framework for Evaluating Behavioral Health Crisis Care.Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Article
- Article
- The Childbirth Experience Survey (CBEX): An Analysis of Qualitative Survey data.Maternal and child health journal · 2025Article
- Collecting Real-Time Patient-Reported Outcome Data During Latent Labor: Feasibility Study of the MyCap Mobile App in Prospective Person-Centered Research.JMIR formative research · 2024Article
- Capacity-Building for Collecting Patient-Reported Outcomes and Experiences (PRO) Data Across Hospitals.Maternal and child health journal · 2023Article
- The Relationship Between Mental Health Literacy, Overall Adaptation and Mental Health of University Freshers [Letter].Psychology research and behavior management · 2023Article
- Person-Centered Maternity Care and Health Outcomes at 1 and 6 Months Postpartum.Journal of women's health (2002) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo develop a conceptual framework and preliminary item bank for childbirth-specific patient-reported outcome (PRO) domains. DATA SOURCES: Women, who were U.S. residents, ≥18 years old, and ≥20 weeks pregnant, were surveyed regarding their childbirth values and preferences (V&P) using online panels. STUDY
designUsing community-based research techniques and Patient-Reported Outcomes Management Information System (PROMIS PRINCIPAL
findingsWe identified 5,880 V&P/PRO items that mapped to 19 domains and 58 subdomains. We present results for the 2,250 survey respondents who anticipated a vaginal delivery in a hospital. Wide variation existed regarding each V&P item, and personal characteristics, such as maternal confidence and ability to cope well with pain, were frequent predictors in the models. The resulting preliminary item bank consisted of 60 key personal characteristics and 63 V&P/PROs.
conclusionsThe conceptual framework and preliminary (PROMIS
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.