Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29797189›Full record

ArticleTransgenic research2018

CRISPR/Cas9 editing of carotenoid genes in tomato.

Caterina D'Ambrosio, Adriana Lucia Stigliani, Giovanni Giorio

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Transgenic research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Recent Advances in Tomato Gene Editing.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Application of CRISPR/Cas9 in Crop Quality Improvement.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Caterina D'AmbrosioMetapontum Agrobios Research Centre, Agenzia Lucana per lo Sviluppo e l'Innovazione in Agricoltura, SS Jonica 106, km 448.2, 75012, Metaponto, Italy. caterina.dambrosio@alsia.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2984-5942
Adriana Lucia StiglianiMetapontum Agrobios Research Centre, Agenzia Lucana per lo Sviluppo e l'Innovazione in Agricoltura, SS Jonica 106, km 448.2, 75012, Metaponto, Italy.
Giovanni GiorioMetapontum Agrobios Research Centre, Agenzia Lucana per lo Sviluppo e l'Innovazione in Agricoltura, SS Jonica 106, km 448.2, 75012, Metaponto, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CRISPR/Cas9 technology is rapidly spreading as genome editing system in crop breeding. The efficacy of CRISPR/Cas9 in tomato was tested on Psy1 and CrtR-b2, two key genes of carotenoid biosynthesis. Carotenoids are plant secondary metabolites that must be present in the diet of higher animals because they exert irreplaceable functions in important physiological processes. Psy1 and CrtR-b2 were chosen because their impairment is easily detectable as a change of fruit or flower color. Two CRISPR/Cas9 constructs were designed to target neighboring sequences on the first exon of each gene. Thirty-four out of forty-nine (69%) transformed plants showed the expected loss-of-function phenotypes due to the editing of both alleles of a locus. However, by including the seven plants edited only at one of the two homologs and showing a normal phenotype, the editing rate reaches the 84%. Although none chimeric phenotype was observed, the cloning of target region amplified fragments revealed that in the 40% of analyzed DNA samples were present more than two alleles. As concerning the type of mutation, it was possible to identify 34 new different alleles across the four transformation experiments. The sequence characterization of the CRISPR/Cas9-induced mutations showed that the most frequent repair errors were the insertion and the deletion of one base. The results of this study prove that the CRISPRCas9 system can be an efficient and quick method for the generation of useful mutations in tomato to be implemented in breeding programs.

Indexed as

AllelesCarotenoidsCRISPR-Cas SystemsGenome, PlantMutationPhenotypePlants, Genetically ModifiedSolanum lycopersicumCarotenoidsCRISPR/Cas9CrtR-b2Gene knockoutMetabolic engineeringPsy1Tomato

Identifiers

PMID29797189
OpenAlexW2803454767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.