Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29797180›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2018

Pre- and early postoperative GFAP serum levels in glioma and brain metastases.

Peter Baumgarten, Johanna Quick-Weller, Florian Gessler, Marlies Wagner, Julia Tichy, Marie-Therese Forster, Christian Foerch, Volker Seifert, Michel Mittelbronn, Christian Senft

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Peter BaumgartenDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt, 60528, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. peter.baumgarten2@kgu.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2563-2691
Johanna Quick-WellerDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt, 60528, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Florian GesslerDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt, 60528, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Marlies WagnerInstitute of Neuroradiology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Julia TichyDepartment of Neurology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Marie-Therese ForsterDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt, 60528, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Christian FoerchDepartment of Neurology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Volker SeifertDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt, 60528, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Michel MittelbronnEdinger Institute, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Christian SenftDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt, 60528, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Goethe University Frankfurt · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

subjectTo date there is no established tumor marker for the clinical follow-up of glioblastoma, WHO grade IV, (GBM) which constitutes the most frequent and malignant primary brain tumor. However, since there is promising data that the serum glial fibrillary acidic protein (sGFAP) may serve as a biomarker for glial brain tumors, this prospective study aimed at evaluating the diagnostic relevance of perioperative changes in sGFAP levels for the assessment of residual glial tumor tissue in patients undergoing surgery of intracerebral tumors.

methodsSerum GFAP was measured using an electrochemiluminometric immunoassay (ElecsysR GFAP prototype test, Roche Diagnostics, Penzberg/Germany) in 32 prospectively recruited patients between September 2009 and August 2010. Twenty-five were diagnosed with glioma and seven with brain metastases (BM). We assessed sGFAP levels prior to and at different time points during the early postoperative phase until patient discharge.

resultsThere were only significant differences in the pre-operative sGFAP levels of patients with gliomas compared to BM (0.18 vs. 0.08 µg/l; p = 0.0198, Welch's t-Test). Even though there was an increase of sGFAP after surgery, there were no significant differences between glioma and BM patients at any other time point. Peak sGFAP levels where reached on postoperative day 1 followed by a slight decrease, but not reaching pre-operative levels until postop day 7. There was no significant correlation between postoperative glioma tumor volume and sGFAP levels in univariate analyses.

conclusionAccording to our data sGFAP does not appear to be suitable to detect residual glioma tissue in the acute postoperative phase.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorBrain NeoplasmsFemaleGlial Fibrillary Acidic ProteinGliomaHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative PeriodPreoperative PeriodProspective StudiesBiomarkers, TumorGFAP protein, humanGlial Fibrillary Acidic ProteinBiomarkerBrain metastasisGFAPGlioblastomaResection

Identifiers

PMID29797180
OpenAlexW2804645725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.