ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2018
Pre- and early postoperative GFAP serum levels in glioma and brain metastases.
Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Blood-Based Biomarkers for Glioma in the Context of Gliomagenesis: A Systematic Review.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Prospective evaluation of GFAP point-of-care testing for rapid diagnosis of glioblastoma.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2026Article
- Plasma glial fibrillary acidic protein as a biomarker of blood-brain barrier integrity in patients with occult cerebral small vessel disease.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
- Glial fibrillary acidic protein, neurofilament light, matrix metalloprotease 3 and fatty acid binding protein 4 as non-invasive brain tumor biomarkers.Clinical proteomics · 2024Article
- Circulating Brain Injury Biomarkers: A Novel Method for Quantification of the Impact on the Brain After Tumor Surgery.Neurosurgery · 2023Article
- Discovery of novel glioma serum biomarkers by proximity extension assay.Clinical proteomics · 2023Article
- Blood GFAP as an emerging biomarker in brain and spinal cord disorders.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2022Review
- Clinical utility of serum glial fibrillary acidic protein in glial neoplasm.Surgical neurology international · 2022Article
- FOXN3 inhibits cell proliferation and invasion via modulating the AKT/MDM2/p53 axis in human glioma.Aging · 2021Article
- The Cytoskeleton-A Complex Interacting Meshwork.Cells · 2019Review
- Emerging blood-based biomarkers for the detection of parenchymal brain metastasis: Current progress and future perspectives.Neuro-oncology advancesReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
subjectTo date there is no established tumor marker for the clinical follow-up of glioblastoma, WHO grade IV, (GBM) which constitutes the most frequent and malignant primary brain tumor. However, since there is promising data that the serum glial fibrillary acidic protein (sGFAP) may serve as a biomarker for glial brain tumors, this prospective study aimed at evaluating the diagnostic relevance of perioperative changes in sGFAP levels for the assessment of residual glial tumor tissue in patients undergoing surgery of intracerebral tumors.
methodsSerum GFAP was measured using an electrochemiluminometric immunoassay (ElecsysR GFAP prototype test, Roche Diagnostics, Penzberg/Germany) in 32 prospectively recruited patients between September 2009 and August 2010. Twenty-five were diagnosed with glioma and seven with brain metastases (BM). We assessed sGFAP levels prior to and at different time points during the early postoperative phase until patient discharge.
resultsThere were only significant differences in the pre-operative sGFAP levels of patients with gliomas compared to BM (0.18 vs. 0.08 µg/l; p = 0.0198, Welch's t-Test). Even though there was an increase of sGFAP after surgery, there were no significant differences between glioma and BM patients at any other time point. Peak sGFAP levels where reached on postoperative day 1 followed by a slight decrease, but not reaching pre-operative levels until postop day 7. There was no significant correlation between postoperative glioma tumor volume and sGFAP levels in univariate analyses.
conclusionAccording to our data sGFAP does not appear to be suitable to detect residual glioma tissue in the acute postoperative phase.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.