ArticleLung2018
Sedation with Propofol for Bronchoscopy in Cystic Fibrosis Lung Transplant Recipients.
Article in Lung, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical effects of remimazolam alone or in combination with dexmedetomidine in patients receiving bronchoscopy and influences on postoperative cognitive function: a randomized-controlled trial.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2023Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionFlexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy (FFB) plays an important role in the surveillance of cystic fibrosis (CF) patients after lung transplantation (LTx). With rapid onset and clearance, propofol provides a safe and efficient method for sedation during FFB, yet sedation requirements for CF patients are not well described.
objectivesDue to pharmacokinetic differences for other classes of drugs in CF patients, this study was performed to examine propofol requirements for sedation during bronchoscopy in lung transplant recipients with CF.
methodsA single-center retrospective cohort study was performed to examine propofol sedation requirements during outpatient surveillance. FFB procedures with transbronchial biopsy (TBB) in post-LTx recipients between 2009 and 2014 were conducted.
resultsA total of 40 FFB procedures with TBB were performed 20 CF (11 females), 20 non-CF (11 females). Mean (± SD) age was 25.6 ± 9.2 (range 13-42) years and 22.2 ± 10.8 (range 11-39) years for the CF and non-CF groups, respectively. Propofol requirements were significantly higher in the CF patients compared to the non-CF patients. Mean (± SD) propofol dose for CF patients was 334 ± 86 versus 214 ± 88 mg for non-CF patients (p < 0.001). Mean (± SD) propofol dose per weight (mg/kg) was 6.5 ± 2.1 for CF patients versus 3.8 ± 1.6 for non-CF patients (p < 0.001).
conclusionsCompared to a non-CF cohort, CF lung transplant recipients required higher dosages of propofol for sedation during FFB with TBB.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.