Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29797030›Full record

ArticleStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2018

Factors predicting intolerance to definitive conventional radiotherapy in geriatric patients.

Chai Hong Rim, Won Sup Yoon, Jung Ae Lee, Dae Sik Yang, Nam Kwon Lee, Young Je Park, Chul Yong Kim

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Prospective trial on telemonitoring of geriatric cancer patients using handheld devices.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2020
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Chai Hong RimDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Ansan Hospital, College of Medicine, Korea University, 123 Jeokgeum street, 15355, Ansan, Gyeonggi-do, Korea (Republic of).
Won Sup YoonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Ansan Hospital, College of Medicine, Korea University, 123 Jeokgeum street, 15355, Ansan, Gyeonggi-do, Korea (Republic of). irionyws@korea.ac.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1934-0852
Jung Ae LeeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Guro Hospital, College of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul, Korea (Republic of).
Dae Sik YangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Guro Hospital, College of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul, Korea (Republic of).
Nam Kwon LeeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Anam Hospital, College of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul, Korea (Republic of).
Young Je ParkDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Anam Hospital, College of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul, Korea (Republic of).
Chul Yong KimDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Anam Hospital, College of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul, Korea (Republic of).
Korea University · KR

Funding

Korea Baptist Theological University/Seminary K1719621
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAlthough radiotherapy can be administered with a relatively low therapeutic burden, many elderly patients do not complete radiotherapy. In order to predict intolerance during radiotherapy, this study retrospectively analyzed the frequency of and risk factors for radiotherapy interruption among geriatric patients.

methodsFrom September 2009 to December 2016, 353 patients aged ≥70 years received definitive radiotherapy with a conventionally fractionated schedule. "Total interruption" included completion of ≤90% of a planned radiotherapy, temporary discontinuation, and treatment-related mortality within 2 months. "Early-phase incompletion" and "mid-phase incompletion" represented completion of ≤50 and ≤80% of a planned radiotherapy, respectively.

resultsThe median age of patients was 74 years. Early- and mid-phase incompletions and total interruption occurred in 4.2, 9.3, and 19.3% of patients, respectively. Total interruption occurred frequently in cancers involving the thorax (27.4%), head and neck (23.1%), abdomen (20.0%), pelvis (17.4%), and breast/extremity (8.1%). The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score (P = 0.004 and 0.002), serum albumin level (P = 0.016 and 0.002), and the expected 5‑year survival (P = 0.033 and 0.034) were significant factors for mid-phase incompletion and total interruption. Age ≥ 75 years (P = 0.008), concurrent chemotherapy (P = 0.017), and the extent of radiation field (P = 0.027) were factors associated with total interruption.

conclusionOverall, 19.3% of the elderly patients showed treatment intolerance during conventional radiotherapy. Serum albumin level and ECOG performance score should be considered as surrogate markers for radiotherapy interruption prior to the decision regarding definite conventional radiotherapy.

Indexed as

Patient DropoutsActivities of Daily LivingAgedAge FactorsBiomarkersCause of DeathDose Fractionation, RadiationFemaleHumansMaleNeoplasmsPrognosisRadiation InjuriesRadiotherapy, ConformalRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedRetrospective StudiesBiomarkersSerum AlbuminCancerElderlyLife expectancyRisk factorsToxicity

Identifiers

PMID29797030
OpenAlexW2804607334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.