Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29796981›Full record

ArticleJournal of occupational rehabilitation2019

Development and Implementation of a Mental Health Work Rehabilitation Program: Results of a Developmental Evaluation.

Chantal Sylvain, Marie-José Durand, Astrid Velasquez Sanchez, Nathalie Lessard, Pascale Maillette

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Factors affecting patients' journey with primary healthcare services during mental health-related sick leave.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chantal SylvainSchool of Rehabilitation, Université de Sherbrooke, Longueuil, Canada. chantal.sylvain@usherbrooke.ca.ORCID 0000-0001-6806-9280
Marie-José DurandSchool of Rehabilitation, Université de Sherbrooke, Longueuil, Canada.
Astrid Velasquez SanchezCentre for Action in Work Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation (CAPRIT), Hôpital Charles-Le Moyne Research Centre, Université de Sherbrooke, Longueuil Campus, 150 Place Charles-Le Moyne, Longueuil, QC, J4K 0A8, Canada.
Nathalie LessardCentre intégré de santé et de services sociaux de Laval, 1755, boulevard René-Laennec, Laval, QC, H7M 3L9, Canada.
Pascale MailletteCentre for Action in Work Disability Prevention and Rehabilitation (CAPRIT), Hôpital Charles-Le Moyne Research Centre, Université de Sherbrooke, Longueuil Campus, 150 Place Charles-Le Moyne, Longueuil, QC, J4K 0A8, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose Long-term work disability due to common mental disorders (CMDs) is a growing problem. Yet optimal interventions remain unclear and little is known about implementation challenges in everyday practice. This study aimed to support and evaluate, in real time, the development and implementation of a work rehabilitation program (WRP) designed to promote post-CMD return-to-work (RTW). Methods A 2-year developmental evaluation was performed using a participatory approach. At program outset, the researchers held five work meetings to revise the program's logic model and discuss its underlying change theory with clinicians. Data collection tools used throughout the study period were structured charts of activities conducted with workers (n = 41); in-depth interviews with program clinicians and managers (n = 9); and participant observation during work meetings. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Qualitative data underwent thematic analysis using a processual approach. Results Three types of activity were developed and implemented: individual and group interventions targeting workers, and joint activities targeting partners (physicians, employers, others). While worker-targeted activities were generally implemented as planned, joint activities were sporadic. Analysis of the implementation process revealed five challenges faced by clinicians. Determinants included clinicians, host organization, sociopolitical context and resources provided by the evaluation. Conclusion The program studied is original in that it is based on the best available scientific knowledge, yet adapted to contextual particularities. The identified implementation challenges highlight the need for greater importance to be placed on the external, non-program context to ensure sustainable implementation in everyday practice.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleHumansMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedPersons with DisabilitiesProgram EvaluationQualitative ResearchReturn to WorkSick LeaveImplementationMental disordersProgram developmentReturn to workSick leave

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.