Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29796975›Full record

ArticleJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2019

Differences in attenuation pattern in myocardial SPECT between CZT and conventional gamma cameras.

Jenny Oddstig, Elin Martinsson, Jonas Jögi, Henrik Engblom, Cecilia Hindorf

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Assessment of Myocardial CZT SPECT Recording in a Forward-Leaning Bikerlike Position.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2019
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Multi-center study of inter-rater reproducibility, image quality, and diagnostic accuracy of CZT versus conventional SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Quantification of myocardial blood flow by CZT-SPECT with motion correction and comparison withJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review of cardiovascular imaging in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 2019: Single-photon emission computed tomography.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jenny OddstigDepartment of Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden. jenny.oddstig@skane.se.
Elin MartinssonDepartment of Medical Radiation Physics, Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Jonas JögiDepartment of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, 221 85, Lund, Sweden.
Henrik EngblomDepartment of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University, 221 85, Lund, Sweden.
Cecilia HindorfDepartment of Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Lund University · SESkåne University Hospital · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI), single-photon emission tomography (SPECT) soft-tissue attenuation by the abdomen, breasts, and lateral chest wall may create artifacts that mimic true perfusion defects. This may cause misdiagnosis of myocardial perfusion. The aim of the present study was to compare the localization, extent, and depth of attenuation artifacts in MPI SPECT for a multi-pinhole cadmium zinc telluride (CZT) camera vs a conventional gamma camera.

methodsPhantom and patient measurements were performed using a CZT camera (GE NM 530c) and a conventional gamma camera (GE Ventri). All images were attenuation corrected with externally acquired low-dose computed tomography. The localization, extent, and depth of the attenuation artifact were quantified by comparing attenuation-corrected and non-attenuation-corrected images.

resultsAttenuation artifacts were shifted from the inferolateral wall to the lateral wall using the CZT camera compared to a conventional camera in both the patient and the phantom. The extent of the attenuation artifact was significantly larger for the CZT camera compared to the conventional camera (23 ± 5% vs 15 ± 5%, P < .001) for patients and the result was similar for the phantom (28% vs 19%). Furthermore, the depth of the attenuation artifact (percent of maximum counts) was less pronounced for the CZT camera than for the conventional camera, both for phantom measurements (73% vs 67%) and patients (72 ± 3% vs 68 ± 4%, P < .001).

conclusionsAttenuation artifacts are found in different locations to different extents and depths when using a CZT camera vs a conventional gamma camera for MPI SPECT. This should be taken into consideration when evaluating MPI SPECT studies to avoid misinterpretation of myocardial perfusion distribution.

Indexed as

Gamma CamerasMyocardial Perfusion ImagingTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonAgedAged, 80 and overArtifactsCadmiumFemaleHeartHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial IschemiaMyocardiumPerfusionCadmiumCdZnTeTelluriumZincattenuation artifactconventional gamma cameraCZT detectorMyocardial perfusion imagingSPECT

Identifiers

PMID29796975
PMCPMC6908561
OpenAlexW2803333040

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.