Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29796910›Full record

ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2018

Frailty Assessment Predicts Acute Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Screening Colonoscopy.

Sasha Taleban, Nima Toosizadeh, Shilpa Junna, Todd Golden, Sehem Ghazala, Rita Wadeea, Coco Tirambulo, Jane Mohler

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06507527 (ASSESSMENT OF THE ADEQUACY IN CARE OF THE FRAGILE PATIENT IN A DIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY UNIT FRIEND Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06507527 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

ASSESSMENT OF THE ADEQUACY IN CARE OF THE FRAGILE PATIENT IN A DIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY UNIT FRIEND Study (FRailty In ENDoscopy) Estudi FRIEND (FRailty In ENDoscopy)

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorParc de Salut MarRan2024 to 2025Enrolled1,474ConditionsFrailty, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions, ComplicationArmsCollection of variables
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sasha TalebanCollege of Medicine, University of Arizona, 1501 N. Campbell Ave, Tucson, AZ, 85718, USA. staleban@deptofmed.arizona.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1428-6359
Nima ToosizadehCollege of Medicine, University of Arizona, 1501 N. Campbell Ave, Tucson, AZ, 85718, USA.
Shilpa JunnaCollege of Medicine, University of Arizona, 1501 N. Campbell Ave, Tucson, AZ, 85718, USA.
Todd GoldenArizona Center on Aging, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Sehem GhazalaCollege of Medicine, University of Arizona, 1501 N. Campbell Ave, Tucson, AZ, 85718, USA.
Rita WadeeaCollege of Medicine, University of Arizona, 1501 N. Campbell Ave, Tucson, AZ, 85718, USA.
Coco TirambuloArizona Center on Aging, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Jane MohlerCollege of Medicine, University of Arizona, 1501 N. Campbell Ave, Tucson, AZ, 85718, USA.
University of Arizona · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundColonoscopy is associated with multiple adverse outcomes. With an aging population undergoing colorectal cancer screening, few modalities exist to assess the patient risk prior to colonoscopy. Frailty, the age-related decline in reserve and function across multiple organ systems, predicts poor surgical outcomes, but its role in endoscopy is unclear.

aimsThis prospective cohort study assesses the efficacy of frailty in predicting acute colonoscopy outcomes.

methodsParticipants aged ≥ 50 years undergoing screening colonoscopy at a tertiary care center were recruited over 2 months ending in July 2017. Frailty was assessed using a validated 20-s upper-extremity frailty test, which measures the capacity of muscle performance. Demographic data, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status, and Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) were evaluated. Procedure-related adverse events and cardiopulmonary changes during and in the immediate post-procedure period were recorded. Adverse events were stratified into minor and major events. Chi-square and ANCOVA models were used in the analysis.

resultsNinety-nine adults (mean age 62.8 years) were enrolled, among which 49 were non-frail and 50 were pre-frail/frail; 50 were female. Overall, 55 participants experienced a total of 87 adverse events. Frailty and ASA status were significantly associated with colonoscopy adverse events (p = 0.01 and p = 0.02, respectively). Age and CCI did not predict colonoscopy outcomes.

conclusionsCompared to age and CCI, frailty status better predicts colonoscopy outcomes in older adults. Among adults undergoing colonoscopy, routine frailty screening should be considered for risk stratification. Additional prospective studies evaluating frailty measurements in endoscopy will further clarify its role in forecasting adverse events.

Indexed as

FrailtyAgedColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsComorbidityEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CareRisk AdjustmentRisk AssessmentUnited StatesAgeASAColonoscopyComorbidityFrailtyOlderOutcomesScreening

Identifiers

PMID29796910
OpenAlexW2804311631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.