Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29796896›Full record

ReviewDer Nervenarzt2018

[Current concepts of resilience research].

A M Kunzler, D A Gilan, R Kalisch, O Tüscher, K Lieb

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Nervenarzt, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Systematic Review: Measurement Methods and Concept of Resilience Among Seafarers.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Finding a path in a methodological jungle: a qualitative research of resilience.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

A M KunzlerDeutsches Resilienz Zentrum (DRZ) Mainz, Mainz, Deutschland. Angela.Kunzler@unimedizin-mainz.de.
D A GilanDeutsches Resilienz Zentrum (DRZ) Mainz, Mainz, Deutschland.
R KalischDeutsches Resilienz Zentrum (DRZ) Mainz, Mainz, Deutschland.
O TüscherDeutsches Resilienz Zentrum (DRZ) Mainz, Mainz, Deutschland.
K LiebDeutsches Resilienz Zentrum (DRZ) Mainz, Mainz, Deutschland.
German Climate Computing Centre · DEJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DETranslationale Onkologie an der Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStress-related mental disorders are the most prevalent and cost-intensive disorders of our time. On the other hand, the maintenance of mental health despite stressors, i. e. resilience, is a frequent phenomenon. Research on psychological resilience and its underlying mechanisms offers innovative possibilities for health promotion. It requires a consistent understanding of resilience and adequate methods of operationalization.

objectivesModern concepts of the definition, operationalization and assessment of resilience as well as its implications for study designs in resilience research. MATERIAL AND

methodsAnalysis and discussion of current works and expert recommendations for the design of resilience research.

resultsResilience research is undergoing a period of transition. Based on a new understanding of resilience as a dynamic and modifiable process, new approaches for operationalization and assessment were proposed. These include, for example, a transdiagnostic approach and the identification of resilience mechanisms, the consideration of stressor exposure in measuring the construct, and longitudinal cohort studies.

conclusionsIn the upcoming decades, further profitable findings from current prospective longitudinal studies can be expected. One challenge for future resilience research consists in the continuous dissemination and implementation of the approaches described.

Indexed as

ResearchResilience, PsychologicalHealth PromotionHumansLongitudinal StudiesMental HealthProspective StudiesHealthcare promotionLongitudinal studiesResilience mechanismsResilience scoreStressor exposure

Identifiers

PMID29796896
OpenAlexW2803966406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.