Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29796895›Full record

Observational studyDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2019

[Investigations on in-hospital mortality in pancreatic surgery : Results of a multicenter observational study].

I Gastinger, F Meyer, A Shardin, H Ptok, H Lippert, H Dralle

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

I GastingerAN-Institut für Qualitätssicherung in der Operativen Medizin, Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Deutschland. I.Gastinger@freenet.de.
F MeyerKlinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral‑, Gefäß- und Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Magdeburg A.ö.R., Magdeburg, Deutschland.
A ShardinLehrstuhl Witschaftsmathematik, Brandenburgischen Technischen Universität Cottbus, Cottbus, Deutschland.
H PtokKlinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral‑, Gefäß- und Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Magdeburg A.ö.R., Magdeburg, Deutschland.
H LippertAN-Institut für Qualitätssicherung in der Operativen Medizin, Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Deutschland.
H DralleSektion Endokrine Chirurgie, Klinik für Allgemein -, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Essen, Deutschland.
An-Institut für Qualitätssicherung in der operativen Medizin · DEBrandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg · DEEssen University Hospital · DEKlinikum Magdeburg · DEOtto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg · DEUniversity Hospital Magdeburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe rate of hospital mortality (in-hospital mortality) after complex pancreatic resections cannot be used as a decision-making criterion with no further analysis and specification. Such analysis has to provide a risk-adjusted benchmarking including a continuous evaluation taking into account the frequency of a surgical procedure and its competent perioperative management. MATERIAL AND

methodsAs part of the Prospective Evaluation study Elective Pancreatic surgery (PEEP), overall 2003 patients were enrolled over a 3-year time period from 01 January 2006 to 12 December 2008, who underwent elective pancreatic surgery in 27 surgical departments. Included in the study were only hospitals which perform pancreatic resections. In addition to the analysis of the current situation of the operative treatment of pancreatic diseases, the complex aspects of the in-hospital mortality as a main outcome parameter were investigated.

resultsOut of all enrolled patients (n = 2003), 75 patients (3.7%) died during the hospital stay. In the group of 1045 patients with partial pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), 43 patients did not survive the hospital stay (4.1%). Similarly, such low in-hospital mortality rates were observed after total pancreatoduodenectomy (3.8%) and after left-sided resection of the pancreas (1.9%). With respect to a univariate risk stratification, advanced age and an American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) score of 3 and 4 had a significant impact on in-hospital mortality. Multivariate regression analysis within the PD group revealed an increased need for blood transfusions and a delay in oral feeding as factors closely associated with specific complications with a significant impact on in-hospital mortality. Significant differences in the in-hospital mortality rates were found when comparing hospital volume groups, such as 10-20 vs. >20 cases/year for the 831 Kausch-Whipple procedures for adenocarcinoma and chronic pancreatitis. DISCUSSION: An adequate in-hospital mortality rate in the continuous benchmarking represents an acceptable quality level of structural and therapeutic predictions in pancreatic resections. The participation of surgical departments with complex oncosurgical interventions in clinical multicenter observational studies as a contribution to research on surgical care appears reasonable and recommendable since the results of such studies can provide a contribution to decision-making processes in daily surgical practice.

Indexed as

Hospital MortalityPancreatic NeoplasmsPancreaticoduodenectomyHumansPancreasPancreatectomyProspective StudiesChronic pancreatitisHospital mortalityInfluencing factorsPancreas cancerPancreaticoduodenectomyPancreatic resection

Identifiers

PMID29796895
OpenAlexW2803963862

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.