ReviewDer Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen2018
[Sacral nerve modulation in coloproctology].
Review in Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Case Report: A rare case of bone destructive sacrococcygeal chordoma presenting as anal distension.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sacral nerve modulation and stimulation (SNM/SNS) is a minimally invasive treatment for fecal incontinence, which has become widely established in recent years. Modulation of sacral nerve roots occurs through an electrode which is placed in the sacral foramina S2-4. By complex spinal and supraspinal mechanisms, rectal compliance is improved and anal incontinence episodes are reduced. The use of SNM is a suitable therapeutic option for nearly all causes of fecal incontinence refractory to conservative treatment. In the majority of patients, a significant reduction of incontinence episodes or a complete relief of symptoms is achieved. These results are also observed in long-term follow-up. Although the efficacy of SNM in constipation is less well established, it may be considered in patients who fail to respond to conservative measures. The role of further potential indications for SNM/SNS in coloproctological disorders is discussed in the present review.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.