ReviewDrug safety2018
Safety of Biologics, Including Biosimilars: Perspectives on Current Status and Future Direction.
Review in Drug safety, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy and Safety in the Continued Treatment With a Biosimilar Drug in Patients Receiving Infliximab: A Systematic Review in the Context of Decision-Making From a Latin-American Country.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2019Pooled it
- Safety, efficacy, and immunogenicity of a novel IgG degrading enzyme (KJ103): results from two randomised, blinded, phase 1 clinical trials.Gene therapy · 2025Trial
- Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases: Addressing Safety Concerns and Enhancing the Accessibility of Biosimilars.Current medical science · 2026Review
- Migraine, monoclonal antibodies, and monitoring: a review of pharmacovigilance in the era of biologics.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Biologics and biosimilars medication errors in Saudi Arabia: a nationwide retrospective observational real-world study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- Article
- Biosimilars versus biological therapy in inflammatory bowel disease: challenges and targeting strategies using drug delivery systems.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2025Review
- Factors associated with hematological adverse reactions of drugs authorized via the centralized procedure.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- An Overview of Biosimilars-Development, Quality, Regulatory Issues, and Management in Healthcare.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Detection of novel drug-adverse drug reaction signals in rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis: analysis of Korean real-world biologics registry data.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Effectiveness and safety of GnRH antagonist originator and generic in real-world clinical practice: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Article
- Ranibizumab Biosimilars in Treating Retinal Disorders: A Cost-Effective Revolution?Drug design, development and therapy · 2024Review
- Real-world switching and discontinuation outcomes of infliximab biosimilars in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A scoping review.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2023Article
- Systematic review with meta-analysis: Efficacy and safety of biological treatment on salivary gland function in primary Sjögren's syndrome.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Review
- Biosimilars in Oncology: Latest Trends and Regulatory Status.Pharmaceutics · 2022Review
- Rituximab and Pyoderma Gangrenosum: An Investigation of Disproportionality Using a Systems Biology-Informed Approach in the FAERS Database.Drugs - real world outcomes · 2022Article
- BOB: Bayesian optimal design for biosimilar trials with co-primary endpoints.Statistics in medicine · 2022Article
- Vasculitis induced by biological agents used in rheumatology practice: A systematic review.Archives of rheumatology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In recent years, marketing of highly innovative and costly biologics improved the management of high-burden diseases such as autoimmune diseases, cancers, and chronic renal failure. Several widely prescribed biologics have recently lost or will shortly lose their patents, thus opening avenues to the marketing of a growing number of biosimilars worldwide, which are products similar in terms of quality, safety, and efficacy to already licensed reference products, thus allowing for potential savings in pharmaceutical expenditure. Numerous debates about the interchangeability between biosimilars and reference products are still ongoing, owing to concerns about potential immunogenicity raised by switching, which may cause a lack of effect and toxicity. Patients successfully treated with biologic therapy may theoretically receive biosimilars to contain costs, if reference product and related biosimilar are judged as interchangeable. However, the positions of regulatory agencies on the interchangeability and automatic substitution of biologics with biosimilars are very different. The benefit-risk profile of biosimilars has been often questioned by clinicians owing to the limited amount of pre-marketing information on clinical efficacy and safety, despite biosimilarity being based on a comparability exercise with the reference product to gain the biosimilar approval. Nevertheless, after more than 10 years of marketing from the first biosimilar approval in Europe, no proof of differences in terms of the safety profile of biosimilars and originators has been reported. In this context, post-marketing evaluation of both biologics and biosimilars safety profiles through analyses from spontaneous reporting databases and claims databases is crucial. An important issue for the pharmacovigilance of biologics concerns the traceability, indicating the brand name and batch number in spontaneous adverse drug reaction reports, but this requirement is not frequently addressed. This review aims to provide an overview of the characteristics and potential challenges in the safety profile assessment of biologics with a focus on the post-marketing setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29796832What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.