Shaken baby syndrome is real.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Identifying Abusive Head Trauma in an Infant.Cureus · 2024
   Article
2. New Insights into the Diagnosis and Age Determination of Retinal Hemorrhages from Abusive Head Trauma: A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
   Review
3. The impact of the consensus statement on abusive head trauma in infants and young children.Pediatric radiology · 2021
   Review
4. Shaken Baby Syndrome: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features in Abusive Head Trauma.Brain sciences · 2021
   Review
5. Clinical guidelines for traumatic brain injuries in children and boys.European journal of translational myology · 2020
   Article
6. Advances and Future Directions of Diagnosis and Management of Pediatric Abusive Head Trauma: A Review of the Literature.Frontiers in neurology · 2020
   Review

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as