Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29796778›Full record

ArticleJournal of cheminformatics2018

Putting hands to rest: efficient deep CNN-RNN architecture for chemical named entity recognition with no hand-crafted rules.

Ilia Korvigo, Maxim Holmatov, Anatolii Zaikovskii, Mikhail Skoblov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cheminformatics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ilia KorvigoLaboratory of Functional Analysis of the Genome, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Moscow, Russia. ilia.korvigo@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9049-1111
Maxim HolmatovSt. Petersburg State Pediatric Medical University, St. Petersburg, Russia.
Anatolii ZaikovskiiSt. Petersburg State University, St. Petersburg, Russia.
Mikhail SkoblovLaboratory of Functional Analysis of the Genome, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Moscow, Russia.

Funding

Russian Science Foundation 14-26-00094
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chemical named entity recognition (NER) is an active field of research in biomedical natural language processing. To facilitate the development of new and superior chemical NER systems, BioCreative released the CHEMDNER corpus, an extensive dataset of diverse manually annotated chemical entities. Most of the systems trained on the corpus rely on complicated hand-crafted rules or curated databases for data preprocessing, feature extraction and output post-processing, though modern machine learning algorithms, such as deep neural networks, can automatically design the rules with little to none human intervention. Here we explored this approach by experimenting with various deep learning architectures for targeted tokenisation and named entity recognition. Our final model, based on a combination of convolutional and stateful recurrent neural networks with attention-like loops and hybrid word- and character-level embeddings, reaches near human-level performance on the testing dataset with no manually asserted rules. To make our model easily accessible for standalone use and integration in third-party software, we've developed a Python package with a minimalistic user interface.

Indexed as

BiocreativeChemdnerChemicalConditional random fieldsConvolutional neural networkDeep learningNamed entities recognitionNeural attentionRecurrent neural networkText miningTokenisation

Identifiers

PMID29796778
PMCPMC5966369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.