Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29796769›Full record

ArticleJournal of materials science. Materials in medicine2018

Properties of collagen-based hemostatic patch compared to oxidized cellulose-based patch.

Paul Slezak, Xavier Monforte, James Ferguson, Sanja Sutalo, Heinz Redl, Heinz Gulle, Daniel Spazierer

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Paul SlezakLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology, Donaueschingenstrasse 13, A-1200, Vienna, Austria.
Xavier MonforteLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology, Donaueschingenstrasse 13, A-1200, Vienna, Austria.
James FergusonLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology, Donaueschingenstrasse 13, A-1200, Vienna, Austria.
Sanja SutaloLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology, Donaueschingenstrasse 13, A-1200, Vienna, Austria.
Heinz RedlLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology, Donaueschingenstrasse 13, A-1200, Vienna, Austria.
Heinz GulleBaxter Medical Products GmbH, Stella-Klein-Loew Weg 15, A-1020, Vienna, Austria.
Daniel SpaziererBaxter Medical Products GmbH, Stella-Klein-Loew Weg 15, A-1020, Vienna, Austria. daniel_spazierer@baxter.com.
Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology · ATBaxter (Austria) · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two self-adhering hemostatic patches, based on either PEG-coated collagen (PCC) or PEG-coated oxidized cellulose (PCOC), are compared regarding to maximum burst pressure, mechanical stability, and swelling. In addition, the induction of tissue adhesions by the materials was assessed in a rabbit liver abrasion model. Both materials showed comparable sealing efficacy in a burst pressure test (37 ± 16 vs. 35 ± 8 mmHg, P = 0.730). After incubation in human plasma, PCC retained its mechanical properties over the test period of 8 h, while PCOC showed faster degradation after the 2 h time-point. The degradation led to a significantly decreased force at break (minimum force at break 0.55 N during 8 h for PCC, 0.27 N for PCOC; p < 0.001). Further, PCC allowed significantly higher deformation before break (52% after 4 h and 50% after 8 h for PCC, 18% after 4 h and 23% after 8 h for PCOC; p = 0.003 and p < 0.001 for 4 h and 8 h, respectively) and showed less swelling in human plasma (maximum increase in thickness: ~20% PCC, ~100% PCOC). Faster degradation of PCOC was visible macroscopically and histologically in vivo after 14 days. PCC showed visible structural residues with little cellular infiltration while strong infiltration with no remaining structural material was seen with PCOC. In vivo, a higher incidence of adhesion formation after PCOC application was detected. In conclusion, PCC has more reliable mechanical properties, reduced swelling, and less adhesion formation than PCOC. PCC may offer greater clinical benefit for surgeons in procedures that have potential risk for body fluid leakage or that require prolonged mechanical stability.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsCell AdhesionCelluloseCellulose, OxidizedCollagenHemostasisHemostaticsHumansLiverMaterials TestingOxygenPolyethylene GlycolsPressureRabbitsStress, MechanicalBiocompatible MaterialsCelluloseCellulose, OxidizedCollagenHemostaticsOxygenPolyethylene Glycols

Identifiers

PMID29796769
PMCPMC5966486
OpenAlexW2803179140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.