Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29796764›Full record

ReviewInternational orthopaedics2018

History of concentrated or expanded mesenchymal stem cells for hip osteonecrosis: is there a target number for osteonecrosis repair?

Philippe Hernigou, Gilles Guerin, Yasuhiro Homma, Arnaud Dubory, Nathalie Chevallier, Hélène Rouard, Charles Henri Flouzat Lachaniette

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International orthopaedics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Orthobiologics in the treatment of hip disorders.World journal of stem cells · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Tracking Cell Transplants in Femoral Osteonecrosis with Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Proof-of-Concept Study in Patients.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Philippe HernigouHôpital Henri Mondor, 94010, Creteil, France. philippe.hernigou@wanadoo.fr.
Gilles GuerinHôpital Henri Mondor, 94010, Creteil, France.
Yasuhiro HommaHôpital Henri Mondor, 94010, Creteil, France.
Arnaud DuboryHôpital Henri Mondor, 94010, Creteil, France.
Nathalie ChevallierHôpital Henri Mondor, 94010, Creteil, France.
Hélène RouardHôpital Henri Mondor, 94010, Creteil, France.
Charles Henri Flouzat LachanietteHôpital Henri Mondor, 94010, Creteil, France.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Henri-Mondor · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDespite multiple possible treatments, the risk of collapse remains the main problem of osteonecrosis. Heart failure (HF). In an effort to address the reverse this issue, curative strategies with regenerative medicine are increasingly being considered. The aim of this technology is to halt or reverse progression of the disease to collapse. MATERIAL AND

methodsThe pioneering report by Hernigou published in 2002 was the first pilot study suggesting that injection of bone marrow stem cells was a safe approach able to improve osteonecrosis in patients with early stages. Since then, an impressive number of studies and trials employing unselected BM-derived cells (1000 the last 2 years) showed that delivery of those cells to the site of osteonecrosis during core decompression was somehow able to ameliorate the patient with osteonecrosis. In order to translate the promise of this cell therapy into better clinical benefit, many questions need to be addressed. In this review, we therefore analyzed current clinical experience of the literature and our experience of 4000 cases to address these questions and particularly the number of cells that should be injected.

resultsAfter almost 20 years of clinical research in this field, we are still far from having drawn conclusions on the number of cells we should inject in regenerating hip osteonecrosis. Findings are difficult to interpret due to heterogeneity of causes of osteonecrosis, as well as differences in the cells count, sample quality, and stages of osteonecrosis. The authors address specific issues, as cell quality, cell numbers, volume of osteonecrosis, concentration of cells, and ex vivo expansion. Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells are supposed to be "functionally competent," but are collected from the bon, marrow of patients with diseases and risk factors of osteonecrosis. The recipient organ (bone osteonecrosis) is a tissue where several alterations have already occurred. These questions are addressed in this review.

conclusionIn this review, we analyzed current clinical experience regarding cell therapy and address issues that should be a guide for future cell-based therapeutic application in osteonecrosis.

Indexed as

Decompression, SurgicalDisease ProgressionFemur Head NecrosisHip JointHumansMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationTransplantation, AutologousCell therapyConcentrated bone marrowExpanded mesenchymal stem cellsHip osteonecrosisTarget number of cells

Identifiers

PMID29796764
OpenAlexW2803841548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.