ReviewInternational orthopaedics2018
History of concentrated or expanded mesenchymal stem cells for hip osteonecrosis: is there a target number for osteonecrosis repair?
Review in International orthopaedics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mesenchymal stem cell therapy improved outcome of early post-traumatic shoulder osteonecrosis: a prospective randomized clinical study of fifty patients with over ten year follow-up.International orthopaedics · 2021Trial
- Demystifying Our Knowledge of Stem Cells and Progenitor Cells Part I: Basic Concepts Relevant to the Treatment of Osteonecrosis and Other Diseases of the Musculoskeletal System.The Journal of arthroplasty · 2025Review
- Core decompression with autologous bone marrow aspirate injection in humeral head osteonecrosis in adults with sickle cell disease.International orthopaedics · 2021Article
- Orthobiologics in the treatment of hip disorders.World journal of stem cells · 2021Review
- Strategies to Identify Mesenchymal Stromal Cells in Minimally Manipulated Human Bone Marrow Aspirate Concentrate Lack Consensus.The American journal of sports medicine · 2021Article
- Concentrated autologous bone marrow aspirate transplantation versus conservative treatment for corticosteroid-associated osteonecrosis of the femoral head in systemic lupus erythematosus.Journal of rural medicine : JRM · 2021Article
- Bone marrow in orthopaedics (part II): a three hundred and seventy million-year saga from the Devonian to the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic-osteonecrosis; transplantation; "human chimera"; stem cells, bioreactors, and coronavirus disease.International orthopaedics · 2020Review
- Ten-year results of concentrated autologous bone marrow aspirate transplantation for osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a retrospective study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2019Article
- Tracking Cell Transplants in Femoral Osteonecrosis with Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Proof-of-Concept Study in Patients.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2018Article
- Hip osteonecrosis: stem cells for life or behead and arthroplasty?International orthopaedics · 2018Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeDespite multiple possible treatments, the risk of collapse remains the main problem of osteonecrosis. Heart failure (HF). In an effort to address the reverse this issue, curative strategies with regenerative medicine are increasingly being considered. The aim of this technology is to halt or reverse progression of the disease to collapse. MATERIAL AND
methodsThe pioneering report by Hernigou published in 2002 was the first pilot study suggesting that injection of bone marrow stem cells was a safe approach able to improve osteonecrosis in patients with early stages. Since then, an impressive number of studies and trials employing unselected BM-derived cells (1000 the last 2 years) showed that delivery of those cells to the site of osteonecrosis during core decompression was somehow able to ameliorate the patient with osteonecrosis. In order to translate the promise of this cell therapy into better clinical benefit, many questions need to be addressed. In this review, we therefore analyzed current clinical experience of the literature and our experience of 4000 cases to address these questions and particularly the number of cells that should be injected.
resultsAfter almost 20 years of clinical research in this field, we are still far from having drawn conclusions on the number of cells we should inject in regenerating hip osteonecrosis. Findings are difficult to interpret due to heterogeneity of causes of osteonecrosis, as well as differences in the cells count, sample quality, and stages of osteonecrosis. The authors address specific issues, as cell quality, cell numbers, volume of osteonecrosis, concentration of cells, and ex vivo expansion. Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells are supposed to be "functionally competent," but are collected from the bon, marrow of patients with diseases and risk factors of osteonecrosis. The recipient organ (bone osteonecrosis) is a tissue where several alterations have already occurred. These questions are addressed in this review.
conclusionIn this review, we analyzed current clinical experience regarding cell therapy and address issues that should be a guide for future cell-based therapeutic application in osteonecrosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.