ArticleOecologia2018
Genetic variation in aspen phytochemical patterns structures windows of opportunity for gypsy moth larvae.
Article in Oecologia, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Forest defoliation by an invasive outbreak insect: Catastrophic consequences for a charismatic mega moth.Ecology and evolution · 2024Article
- Phenotypic Variation in Phytochemical Defense of Trembling Aspen in Western North America: Genetics, Development, and Geography.Journal of chemical ecology · 2023Article
- Intraspecific variation in plant economic traits predicts trembling aspen resistance to a generalist insect herbivore.Oecologia · 2022Article
- Herbivory in a changing climate-Effects of plant genotype and experimentally induced variation in plant phenology on two summer-active lepidopteran herbivores and one fungal pathogen.Ecology and evolution · 2022Article
- Article
- Implications of seasonal and annual heat accumulation for population dynamics of an invasive defoliator.Oecologia · 2019Article
- From plants to herbivores: novel insights into the ecological and evolutionary consequences of plant variation.Oecologia · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Empirical studies indicate that host-tree bud break will likely advance faster than spring-folivore egg hatch in response to predicted increases in temperature. How these phenological shifts will affect herbivory will depend on temporal patterns of foliar traits that occur during leaf expansion, and their effects on folivore performance. Through fine-scale time series sampling of newly flushed trembling aspen (Populus tremuloides) foliage, we observed a previously unknown peak in phenolic glycoside concentrations that coincides with the emergence of sensitive neonates of gypsy moths and rapidly declines soon after bud break. The magnitude and duration of the initial post-bud break peak in phenolic glycosides varied substantially among genotypes. In contrast, foliar nitrogen concentrations declined at a more uniform rate among genotypes throughout leaf expansion. In addition, leaf toughness remained uniformly low throughout these periods of phytochemical change, and did not rise or vary substantially among genotypes until after anticipated windows of climate change-induced shifts between bud break and egg hatch had elapsed. Controlled manipulation of intervals between gypsy moth egg hatch and aspen bud break generated differences in larval performance among hatch cohorts and host genotypes that corresponded with changes in foliar phenolic glycoside and nitrogen concentrations. These findings indicate that the effects of climate change-induced phenological shifts on herbivory will differ among host plant genotypes, and that genetic variation in foliar chemical patterns will strongly influence this heterogeneity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.