ArticleRomanian journal of ophthalmology
Electrophysiologic evaluation of the visual pathway at different depths of sevoflurane anesthesia in diabetic rats.
Article in Romanian journal of ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Inter-session repeatability of electroretinography and visual evoked potentials of the Celeris system.Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Insufficient Oligodendrocyte Turnover in Optic Nerve Contributes to Age-Related Axon Loss and Visual Deficits.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023Article
- The p-ERG spatial acuity in the biomedical pig under physiological conditions.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Repeated measurements of ERGs and VEPs using chloral hydrate sedation and propofol anesthesia in young children.Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology · 2021Article
- Retinoprotection by BGP-15, a Hydroximic Acid Derivative, in a Type II Diabetic Rat Model Compared to Glibenclamide, Metformin, and Pioglitazone.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Our study investigated the changes produced by diabetes on the visual pathway in a Wistar rat model. The impact of diabetes at 10 weeks after intraperitoneal streptozotocin (STZ) injection was evaluated through electrophysiological methods like visual evoked potentials (VEP) and electroretinogram (ERG). VEP and ERG were recorded simultaneously under different sevoflurane anesthetic depths. In all tested concentrations, sevoflurane affected the amplitude and latency of VEP and ERG component elements. With increasing anesthetic depths, sevoflurane increased the latencies of VEP N1, P1 and N2 peaks and ERG a- and b- waves in both control and diabetic animals. On the other hand, the amplitude of VEP showed enhancement in higher concentrations of sevoflurane, contrariwise to the drop of amplitude seen in the ERG. Diabetes additionally increased the latencies of VEP peaks and decreased the N1-P1 amplitude of the VEP when compared to control at the same anesthetic depth. The a- and b- waves were also delayed by diabetes at 10 weeks post-STZ diabetic induction, with the exception of highly profound anesthetic depth in which the result for the b wave were conflicting. We found a reduction in amplitude of the a-b wave in diabetic animals, when ERG was recorded under 6% and 8% sevoflurane concentration. In conclusion, neurophysiological studies like VEP and ERG are useful in the assessment of retinal and optic nerve dysfunctions produced by diabetes, yet considering the alterations that occur during anesthesia if this is used.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29796432PMC5959023W2801320772What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.