Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29796114›Full record

Observational studyClinical epigenetics2018

Circulating tumour DNA for monitoring colorectal cancer-a prospective cohort study to assess relationship to tissue methylation, cancer characteristics and surgical resection.

Erin L Symonds, Susanne K Pedersen, David H Murray, Maher Jedi, Susan E Byrne, Philippa Rabbitt, Rohan T Baker, Dawn Bastin, Graeme P Young

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Clinical epigenetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Erin L Symonds1Flinders Centre for Innovation in Cancer, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University of South Australia, Bedford Park, South Australia 5042 Australia.
Susanne K PedersenClinical Genomics Pty Ltd, North Ryde, New South Wales Australia.
David H MurrayClinical Genomics Pty Ltd, North Ryde, New South Wales Australia.
Maher Jedi1Flinders Centre for Innovation in Cancer, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University of South Australia, Bedford Park, South Australia 5042 Australia.
Susan E Byrne1Flinders Centre for Innovation in Cancer, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University of South Australia, Bedford Park, South Australia 5042 Australia.
Philippa Rabbitt4Colorectal Surgery, Division of Surgery and Perioperative Medicine, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, South Australia Australia.
Rohan T BakerClinical Genomics Pty Ltd, North Ryde, New South Wales Australia.
Dawn Bastin1Flinders Centre for Innovation in Cancer, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University of South Australia, Bedford Park, South Australia 5042 Australia.
Graeme P Young1Flinders Centre for Innovation in Cancer, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University of South Australia, Bedford Park, South Australia 5042 Australia.
Flinders University · AUFlinders Medical Centre · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cell-free circulating tumour-derived DNA (ctDNA) can be detected by testing for methylated Methods: Enrolled patients with invasive CRC had blood collected at diagnosis, prior to any treatment or surgery (peri-diagnostic sample). A subgroup of patients also had cancer and adjacent non-neoplastic tissue collected at surgical resection, as well as a second blood sample collected within 12 months of surgery (post-surgery sample). DNA was extracted from all samples and assayed for methylated Results: Of 187 cases providing peri-diagnostic blood samples, tissue was available in 91, and 93 provided at least one post-surgery blood sample for marker analysis. Significant methylation of either Conclusion: This study has shown that Trial registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry number 12611000318987. Registered 25 March 2011.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNAColonColorectal NeoplasmsDNA MethylationEpigenesis, GeneticFemaleHumansIkaros Transcription FactorMaleNeoplasm StagingProspective StudiesRectumTransaminasesBCAT1 protein, humanBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNAIkaros Transcription FactorIKZF1 protein, humanTransaminasesBCAT1Circulating tumour DNAColorectal cancerIKZF1MethylationResidual diseaseSurgical resection

Identifiers

PMID29796114
PMCPMC5956533
OpenAlexW2804563464

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.