Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29795964›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemometrics2018

Comparative Chemometric Analysis for Classification of Acids and Bases via a Colorimetric Sensor Array.

Michael J Kangas, Raychelle M Burks, Jordyn Atwater, Rachel M Lukowicz, Billy Garver, Andrea E Holmes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemometrics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Michael J KangasDepartment of Chemistry, Doane University, Crete, NE, USA.
Raychelle M BurksDepartment of Chemistry, St. Edwards University, Austin, TX, USA.
Jordyn AtwaterDepartment of Chemistry, Doane University, Crete, NE, USA.
Rachel M LukowiczDepartment of Chemistry, Doane University, Crete, NE, USA.
Billy GarverDepartment of Mathematics, Doane University, Crete, NE, USA.
Andrea E HolmesDepartment of Chemistry, Doane University, Crete, NE, USA.

Funding

UNMC Structural Biology CoreP20GM103427 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI Heather Colleen Jensen-Smith · 2012 to 2026
$59.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103427
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the increasing availability of digital imaging devices, colorimetric sensor arrays are rapidly becoming a simple, yet effective tool for the identification and quantification of various analytes. Colorimetric arrays utilize colorimetric data from many colorimetric sensors, with the multidimensional nature of the resulting data necessitating the use of chemometric analysis. Herein, an 8 sensor colorimetric array was used to analyze select acid and basic samples (0.5 - 10 M) to determine which chemometric methods are best suited for classification quantification of analytes within clusters. PCA, HCA, and LDA were used to visualize the data set. All three methods showed well-separated clusters for each of the acid or base analytes and moderate separation between analyte concentrations, indicating that the sensor array can be used to identify and quantify samples. Furthermore, PCA could be used to determine which sensors showed the most effective analyte identification. LDA, KNN, and HQI were used for identification of analyte and concentration. HQI and KNN could be used to correctly identify the analytes in all cases, while LDA correctly identified 95 of 96 analytes correctly. Additional studies demonstrated that controlling for solvent and image effects was unnecessary for all chemometric methods utilized in this study.

Indexed as

Colorimetric sensor arrayhit quality index (HQI)image analysisk nearest neighbor analysis (KNN)linear discriminant analysis (LDA)

Identifiers

PMID29795964
PMCPMC5962272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.