Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29795628›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Predicting opioid receptor binding affinity of pharmacologically unclassified designer substances using molecular docking.

Christopher R Ellis, Naomi L Kruhlak, Marlene T Kim, Edward G Hawkins, Lidiya Stavitskaya

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The Rise of Fentanyl: Molecular Aspects and Forensic Investigations.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Christopher R EllisCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research, United States Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3150-2981
Naomi L KruhlakCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research, United States Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States of America.
Marlene T KimCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research, United States Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States of America.
Edward G HawkinsCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research, United States Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States of America.
Lidiya StavitskayaCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research, United States Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, United States of America.
United States Food and Drug Administration · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Opioids represent a highly-abused and highly potent class of drugs that have become a significant threat to public safety. Often there are little to no pharmacological and toxicological data available for new, illicitly used and abused opioids, and this has resulted in a growing number of serious adverse events, including death. The large influx of new synthetic opioids permeating the street-drug market, including fentanyl and fentanyl analogs, has generated the need for a fast and effective method to evaluate the risk a substance poses to public safety. In response, the US FDA's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER) has developed a rapidly-deployable, multi-pronged computational approach to assess a drug's risk to public health. A key component of this approach is a molecular docking model to predict the binding affinity of biologically uncharacterized fentanyl analogs to the mu opioid receptor. The model was validated by correlating the docking scores of structurally diverse opioids with experimentally determined binding affinities. Fentanyl derivatives with sub-nanomolar binding affinity at the mu receptor (e.g. carfentanil and lofentanil) have significantly lower binding scores, while less potent fentanyl derivatives have increased binding scores. The strong correlation between the binding scores and the experimental binding affinities suggests that this approach can be used to accurately predict the binding strength of newly identified fentanyl analogs at the mu receptor in the absence of in vitro data and may assist in the temporary scheduling of those substances that pose a risk to public safety.

Indexed as

Molecular Docking SimulationBinding SitesFentanylHumansKineticsProtein BindingProtein Structure, TertiaryReceptors, Opioid, muThermodynamicscarfentanilFentanyllofentanilReceptors, Opioid, mu

Identifiers

PMID29795628
PMCPMC5967713
OpenAlexW2804674424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.