Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29795616›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2018

Health related quality of life in adults after burn injuries: A systematic review.

Inge Spronk, Catherine Legemate, Irma Oen, Nancy van Loey, Suzanne Polinder, Margriet van Baar

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06263296 (The Impact on Quality of Life in Individual with Burn Injury), which is not on this map. Cited by 71 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06263296 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

The Impact on Quality of Life in Individual with Burn Injury: Utilizing Smartphone Assisted Self-management Education At Aftercare

TypeinterventionalSponsorQueen Mary Hospital, Hong KongRan2024 to 2025Enrolled50ConditionsBurns, Self Efficacy, Burn Second Degree, Burns Third DegreeArmsSelf Management Education
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. [Practice guideline for adult burn rehabilitation nursing (2026 edition)].Zhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi · 2026
    Guideline
  2. Recent Advance Analysis of Recovery in Hospitalized People with COVID-19: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Long-term quality of life and cost-effectiveness of treatment of partial thickness burns: A randomized controlled trial comparing enzyme alginogel vs silver sulfadiazine (FLAM study).Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society · 2020
    Trial
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Quality of Life, PTSD, and Insomnia in Patients with Burn Injuries.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Use of IntegraEuropean burn journal · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Inge SpronkAssociation of Dutch Burn Centres, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-9571-576X
Catherine LegemateAssociation of Dutch Burn Centres, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Irma OenBurn Centre, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Nancy van LoeyAssociation of Dutch Burn Centres, Red Cross Hospital, Beverwijk, the Netherlands.
Suzanne PolinderDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Margriet van BaarAssociation of Dutch Burn Centres, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesMeasurement of health-related quality of life (HRQL) is essential to qualify the subjective burden of burns in survivors. We performed a systematic review of HRQL studies in adult burn patients to evaluate study design, instruments used, methodological quality, and recovery patterns.

methodsA systematic review was performed. Relevant databases were searched from the earliest record until October 2016. Studies examining HRQL in adults after burn injuries were included. Risk of bias was scored using the Quality in Prognostic Studies tool.

resultsTwenty different HRQL instruments were used among the 94 included studies. The Burn Specific Health Scale-Brief (BSHS-B) (46%), the Short Form-36 (SF-36) (42%) and the EuroQol questionnaire (EQ-5D) (9%) were most often applied. Most domains, both mentally and physically orientated, were affected shortly after burns but improved over time. The lowest scores were reported for the domains 'work' and 'heat sensitivity' (BSHS-B), 'bodily pain', 'physical role limitations' (SF-36), and 'pain/discomfort' (EQ-5D) in the short-term and for 'work' and 'heat sensitivity', 'emotional functioning' (SF-36), 'physical functioning' and 'pain/discomfort' in the long-term. Risk of bias was generally low in outcome measurement and high in study attrition.

conclusionConsensus on preferred validated methodologies of HRQL measurement in burn patients would facilitate comparability across studies, resulting in improved insights in recovery patterns and better estimates of HRQL after burns. We recommend to develop a guideline on the measurement of HRQL in burns. Five domains representing a variety of topics had low scores in the long-term and require special attention in the aftermath of burns.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeAdultAge FactorsBurnsHealth SurveysHumansPublication BiasSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID29795616
PMCPMC5967732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.