Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29795614›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Analysis of the resistance mechanisms in sugarcane during Sporisorium scitamineum infection using RNA-seq and microscopy.

Meredith D McNeil, Shamsul A Bhuiyan, Paul J Berkman, Barry J Croft, Karen S Aitken

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
8.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Two SugarcaneJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  4. Transcriptional Regulation of SugarCane Response toJournal of agricultural and food chemistry · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. WildJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Transcriptomic Analysis of Radish (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Proteomic Analysis of the Resistance Mechanisms in Sugarcane duringInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Article
  20. Genomic resources for energy cane breeding in the post genomics era.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Meredith D McNeilCSIRO Plant Industry, Queensland Bioscience Precinct, St Lucia, QLD, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4671-7210
Shamsul A BhuiyanSugar Research Australia Ltd (SRA), Woodford, Australia.
Paul J BerkmanCSIRO Plant Industry, Queensland Bioscience Precinct, St Lucia, QLD, Australia.
Barry J CroftSugar Research Australia Ltd (SRA), Woodford, Australia.
Karen S AitkenCSIRO Plant Industry, Queensland Bioscience Precinct, St Lucia, QLD, Australia.
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation · AUSugar Research Australia (Australia) · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Smut caused by biotrophic fungus Sporisorium scitamineum is a major disease of cultivated sugarcane that can cause considerable yield losses. It has been suggested in literature that there are at least two types of resistance mechanisms in sugarcane plants: an external resistance, due to chemical or physical barriers in the sugarcane bud, and an internal resistance governed by the interaction of plant and fungus within the plant tissue. Detailed molecular studies interrogating these two different resistance mechanisms in sugarcane are scarce. Here, we use light microscopy and global expression profiling with RNA-seq to investigate these mechanisms in sugarcane cultivar CP74-2005, a cultivar that possibly possesses both internal and external defence mechanisms. A total of 861 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified in a comparison between infected and non-infected buds at 48 hours post-inoculation (hpi), with 457 (53%) genes successfully annotated using BLAST2GO software. This includes genes involved in the phenylpropanoid pathway, cell wall biosynthesis, plant hormone signal transduction and disease resistance genes. Finally, the expression of 13 DEGs with putative roles in S. scitamineum resistance were confirmed by quantitative real-time reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis, and the results were consistent with the RNA-seq data. These results highlight that the early sugarcane response to S. scitamineum infection is complex and many of the disease response genes are attenuated in sugarcane cultivar CP74-2005, while others, like genes involved in the phenylpropanoid pathway, are induced. This may point to the role of the different disease resistance mechanisms that operate in cultivars such as CP74-2005, whereby the early response is dominated by external mechanisms and then as the infection progresses, the internal mechanisms are switched on. Identification of genes underlying resistance in sugarcane will increase our knowledge of the sugarcane-S. scitamineum interaction and facilitate the introgression of new resistance genes into commercial sugarcane cultivars.

Indexed as

Disease ResistanceGene Expression Regulation, PlantHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMicroscopyPlant DiseasesPlant ProteinsSaccharumUstilaginalesPlant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID29795614
PMCPMC5993111
OpenAlexW2803616836

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.