Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29795578›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Public reaction to Chikungunya outbreaks in Italy-Insights from an extensive novel data streams-based structural equation modeling analysis.

Naim Mahroum, Mohammad Adawi, Kassem Sharif, Roy Waknin, Hussein Mahagna, Bishara Bisharat, Mahmud Mahamid, Arsalan Abu-Much, Howard Amital, Nicola Luigi Bragazzi and 1 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Use of Digital Tools in Arbovirus Surveillance: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Naim MahroumDepartment of Medicine 'B', Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel.
Mohammad AdawiAzrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar-Ilan University, Zefat, Israel.
Kassem SharifDepartment of Medicine 'B', Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel.
Roy WakninSackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
Hussein MahagnaDepartment of Medicine 'B', Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel.
Bishara BisharatSociety for Health Promotion of the Arab Community, Nazareth, Israel.
Mahmud MahamidAzrieli Faculty of Medicine, Bar-Ilan University, Zefat, Israel.
Arsalan Abu-MuchDepartment of Medicine 'B', Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel.
Howard AmitalDepartment of Medicine 'B', Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel.
Nicola Luigi BragazziSociety for Health Promotion of the Arab Community, Nazareth, Israel.
Abdulla WatadDepartment of Medicine 'B', Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-1404-8027

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recent outbreak of Chikungunya virus in Italy represents a serious public health concern, which is attracting media coverage and generating public interest in terms of Internet searches and social media interactions. Here, we sought to assess the Chikungunya-related digital behavior and the interplay between epidemiological figures and novel data streams traffic. Reaction to the recent outbreak was analyzed in terms of Google Trends, Google News and Twitter traffic, Wikipedia visits and edits, and PubMed articles, exploiting structural modelling equations. A total of 233,678 page-views and 150 edits on the Italian Wikipedia page, 3,702 tweets, 149 scholarly articles, and 3,073 news articles were retrieved. The relationship between overall Chikungunya cases, as well as autochthonous cases, and tweets production was found to be fully mediated by Chikungunya-related web searches. However, in the allochthonous/imported cases model, tweet production was not found to be significantly mediated by epidemiological figures, with web searches still significantly mediating tweet production. Inconsistent relationships were detected in mediation models involving Wikipedia usage as a mediator variable. Similarly, the effect between news consumption and tweets production was suppressed by the Wikipedia usage. A further inconsistent mediation was found in the case of the effect between Wikipedia usage and tweets production, with web searches as a mediator variable. When adjusting for the Internet penetration index, similar findings could be obtained, with the important exception that in the adjusted model the relationship between GN and Twitter was found to be partially mediated by Wikipedia usage. Furthermore, the link between Wikipedia usage and PubMed/MEDLINE was fully mediated by GN, differently from what was found in the unadjusted model. In conclusion-a significant public reaction to the current Chikungunya outbreak was documented. Health authorities should be aware of this, recognizing the role of new technologies for collecting public concerns and replying to them, disseminating awareness and avoid misleading information.

Indexed as

Disease OutbreaksInformation Seeking BehaviorInternetMass MediaScholarly CommunicationChikungunya FeverHealth CommunicationHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansItalyModels, Statistical

Identifiers

PMID29795578
PMCPMC5968406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.