Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29795568›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Land-based crop phenotyping by image analysis: Accurate estimation of canopy height distributions using stereo images.

Jinhai Cai, Pankaj Kumar, Joshua Chopin, Stanley J Miklavcic

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jinhai CaiPhenomics and Bioinformatics Research Centre, University of South Australia, Mawson Lakes, SA 5095, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7298-1579
Pankaj KumarPhenomics and Bioinformatics Research Centre, University of South Australia, Mawson Lakes, SA 5095, Australia.
Joshua ChopinPhenomics and Bioinformatics Research Centre, University of South Australia, Mawson Lakes, SA 5095, Australia.
Stanley J MiklavcicPhenomics and Bioinformatics Research Centre, University of South Australia, Mawson Lakes, SA 5095, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper we report on an automated procedure to capture and characterize the detailed structure of a crop canopy by means of stereo imaging. We focus attention specifically on the detailed characteristic of canopy height distribution-canopy shoot area as a function of height-which can provide an elaborate picture of canopy growth and health under a given set of conditions. We apply the method to a wheat field trial involving ten Australian wheat varieties that were subjected to two different fertilizer treatments. A novel camera self-calibration approach is proposed which allows the determination of quantitative plant canopy height data (as well as other valuable phenotypic information) by stereo matching. Utilizing the canopy height distribution to provide a measure of canopy height, the results compare favourably with manual measurements of canopy height (resulting in an R2 value of 0.92), and are indeed shown to be more consistent. By comparing canopy height distributions of different varieties and different treatments, the methodology shows that different varieties subjected to the same treatment, and the same variety subjected to different treatments can respond in much more distinctive and quantifiable ways within their respective canopies than can be captured by a simple trait measure such as overall canopy height.

Indexed as

AustraliaCrops, AgriculturalPhenotypePlant ShootsTriticum

Identifiers

PMID29795568
PMCPMC5967702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.