Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29795565›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Identification of alterations associated with age in the clustering structure of functional brain networks.

Grover E C Guzman, Joao R Sato, Maciel C Vidal, Andre Fujita

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Grover E C GuzmanDepartment of Computer Science, Institute of Mathematics and Statistics, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Joao R SatoCenter of Mathematics, Computation, and Cognition, Universidade Federal do ABC, Santo André, São Paulo, Brazil.
Maciel C VidalDepartment of Computer Science, Institute of Mathematics and Statistics, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Andre FujitaDepartment of Computer Science, Institute of Mathematics and Statistics, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7756-7051

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Initial studies using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging on the trajectories of the brain network from childhood to adulthood found evidence of functional integration and segregation over time. The comprehension of how healthy individuals' functional integration and segregation occur is crucial to enhance our understanding of possible deviations that may lead to brain disorders. Recent approaches have focused on the framework wherein the functional brain network is organized into spatially distributed modules that have been associated with specific cognitive functions. Here, we tested the hypothesis that the clustering structure of brain networks evolves during development. To address this hypothesis, we defined a measure of how well a brain region is clustered (network fitness index), and developed a method to evaluate its association with age. Then, we applied this method to a functional magnetic resonance imaging data set composed of 397 males under 31 years of age collected as part of the Autism Brain Imaging Data Exchange Consortium. As results, we identified two brain regions for which the clustering change over time, namely, the left middle temporal gyrus and the left putamen. Since the network fitness index is associated with both integration and segregation, our finding suggests that the identified brain region plays a role in the development of brain systems.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAge FactorsBrainBrain MappingChildCluster AnalysisCognitionHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNerve NetNeural PathwaysYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID29795565
PMCPMC5967704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.