ArticleInternational journal of impotence research2018
Patient's choice of health information and treatment modality for Peyronie's disease: a long-term assessment.
Article in International journal of impotence research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Peyronie's disease in Spain: a prospective study.Sexual medicine · 2026Article
- Guideline of guidelines: Peyronie's disease.BJU international · 2026Review
- Comparing and Contrasting Peyronie's Disease Guidelines: Points of Consensus and Deviation.The journal of sexual medicine · 2021Review
- Consulting "Dr Google" for sexual dysfunction: a contemporary worldwide trend analysis.International journal of impotence research · 2020Article
- A review of the evolving landscape between the consumer Internet and men's health.Translational andrology and urology · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite various Peyronie's disease (PD) treatment options, the literature is sparse regarding patient preference for available therapies. Our data explore resource and treatment choices made by PD men following diagnosis. A survey was mailed to 719 randomly selected PD men evaluated at our institution from 1990-2012. Questions included evaluation of treatments and preferred information resources. Results were summarized as a descriptive report with statistical analyses performed as indicated. A total of 162 men (median age 65) responded with median PD duration of 9.2 years. Information sources included medical websites (38.9%), physician (35.8%), and books (<1%). Overall, patients felt 72.5% (SD = 40) of physicians had a good understanding of PD. About 53.1% of men had tried at least one therapy with 37.2% trying two or more. In comparing therapies, most surgical patients reported improvement at 82.8%. Among a cohort of PD men responding to a mailed survey, medical websites were the most widely used source of information. Almost half of the patients chose not to pursue any form of therapy, while the remaining majority elected for non-operative intervention. These results suggest a need for greater patient and provider education on PD management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29795531What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.