SynthesisEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2018
Economic evaluation of genomic sequencing in the paediatric population: a critical review.
Synthesis in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Measuring the health benefits of genome and exome sequencing: a systematic review of economic evaluations.Frontiers in public health · 2025Pooled it
- Genomic Strategies in Pediatric Care: Addressing Rare Diseases in Children.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The cost and cost-effectiveness of whole-exome and whole-genome sequencing: a systematic literature review.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Review
- The cost of genetic diagnosis of suspected hereditary pediatric cataracts with whole-exome sequencing from a middle-income country perspective: a mixed costing analysis.Journal of community genetics · 2024Article
- Cost-effectiveness frameworks for comparing genome and exome sequencing versus conventional diagnostic pathways: A scoping review and recommended methods.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2022Article
- Real-world economic evaluation of prospective rapid whole-genome sequencing compared to a matched retrospective cohort of critically ill pediatric patients in the United States.The pharmacogenomics journal · 2022Article
- 2022 Overview of Metabolic Epilepsies.Genes · 2022Review
- Genome Sequencing for Genetics Diagnosis of Patients With Intellectual Disability: The DEFIDIAG Study.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Review
- Genome sequencing analysis of a family with a child displaying severe abdominal distention and recurrent hypoglycemia.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2020Article
- A Review of Health Economic Studies Comparing Traditional and Massively Parallel Sequencing Diagnostic Pathways for Suspected Genetic Disorders.PharmacoEconomics · 2020Review
- A Review of the Challenges of Using Biomedical Big Data for Economic Evaluations of Precision Medicine.Applied health economics and health policy · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Systematic evidence is critical to the formulation of national health policy to provide public funding for the integration of genomic sequencing into routine clinical care. The purpose of this review is to present systematic evidence on the economic evaluation of genomic sequencing conducted for paediatric patients in clinical care, and to identify any gaps in the methodology of economic evaluations. We undertook a critical review of the empirical evidence from economic evaluations of genomic sequencing among paediatric patients searching five electronic databases. Our inclusion criteria were limited to literature published in the English language between 2010 and 2017 in OECD countries. Articles that met our inclusion criteria were assessed using a recognised checklist for a well-designed economic evaluation. We found 11 full-text articles that met our inclusion criteria. Our analysis found that genomic sequencing markedly increased the diagnostic rate to 16-79%, but lowered the cost by 11-64% compared to the standard diagnostic pathway. Only five recent studies in paediatric clinical cohorts met most of the criteria for a well-designed economic evaluation and demonstrated cost-effectiveness of genomic sequencing in paediatric clinical cohorts of patients. Our review identified the need for improvement in the rigour of the methodologies used to provide robust evidence for the formulation of health policy on public funding to integrate genomic sequencing into routine clinical care. Nonetheless, there is emerging evidence of the cost-effectiveness of genomic sequencing over usual care for paediatric patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.