Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29795447›Full record

ArticleThe ISME journal2018

Burkholderia bacteria use chemotaxis to find social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum hosts.

Longfei Shu, Bojie Zhang, David C Queller, Joan E Strassmann

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ISME journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Complex third-party effects in theProceedings. Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  7. Osmotic stress response of the coral and oyster pathogenApplied and environmental microbiology · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Complexities of Inferring Symbiont Function:Applied and environmental microbiology · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The Ecology and Evolution of Amoeba-Bacterium Interactions.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Genes · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Longfei ShuDepartment of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA. longfei.shu@wustl.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9683-906X
Bojie ZhangDepartment of Chemistry, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3139-4159
David C QuellerDepartment of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA.
Joan E StrassmannDepartment of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA.
Washington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

TrainingP41GM103422 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI YARASHESKI, KEVIN E · 2012 to 2019
$12.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103422
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A key question in cooperation is how to find the right partners and maintain cooperative relationships. This is especially challenging for horizontally transferred bacterial symbionts where relationships must be repeatedly established anew. In the social amoeba Dictyostelium discoideum farming symbiosis, two species of inedible Burkholderia bacteria (Burkholderia agricolaris and Burkholderia hayleyella) initiate stable associations with naive D. discoideum hosts and cause carriage of additional bacterial species. However, it is not clear how the association between D. discoideum and its carried Burkholderia is formed and maintained. Here, we look at precisely how Burkholderia finds its hosts. We found that both species of Burkholderia clones isolated from D. discoideum, but not other tested Burkholderia species, are attracted to D. discoideum supernatant, showing that the association is not simply the result of haphazard engulfment by the amoebas. The chemotactic responses are affected by both partners. We find evidence that B. hayleyella prefers D. discoideum clones that currently or previously carried Burkholderia, while B. agricolaris does not show this preference. However, we find no evidence of Burkholderia preference for their own host clone or for other hosts of their own species. We further investigate the chemical differences of D. discoideum supernatants that might explain the patterns shown above using a mass spectrometry based metabolomics approach. These results show that these bacterial symbionts are able to preferentially find and to some extent choose their unicellular partners. In addition, this study also suggests that bacteria can actively search for and target phagocytic cells, which may help us better understand how bacteria interact with immune systems.

Indexed as

ChemotaxisBurkholderiaDictyosteliumSymbiosis

Identifiers

PMID29795447
PMCPMC6052080
OpenAlexW2803645704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.