Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29795365›Full record

Trial reportNutrition & diabetes2018

Financial incentive strategies for maintenance of weight loss: results from an internet-based randomized controlled trial.

William S Yancy, Pamela A Shaw, Lisa Wesby, Victoria Hilbert, Lin Yang, Jingsan Zhu, Andrea Troxel, David Huffman, Gary D Foster, Alexis C Wojtanowski and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nutrition & diabetes, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03834194 (Effect of Incentives for Self-weighing, Weight Management Goals and Physical Activity Goals on Gaining Weight Healthily During Pregnancy), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03834194 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Incentives for Self-weighing, Weight Management Goals and Physical Activity Goals on Gaining Weight Healthily During Pregnancy

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of TennesseeRan2019 to 2020Enrolled40ConditionsGestational Weight GainArmsLottery + Monthly Weight, Lottery + Overall Weight + Exercise, Lottery + Overall Weight, Loss + Overall Weight, Loss + Overall Weight + Exercise
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

William S YancyDuke University Diet and Fitness Center, Durham, NC, USA. yancy006@mc.duke.edu.
Pamela A ShawDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Lisa WesbyLeonard Davis Institute Center for Health Incentives and Behavioral Economics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Victoria HilbertLeonard Davis Institute Center for Health Incentives and Behavioral Economics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Lin YangDepartment of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Jingsan ZhuLeonard Davis Institute Center for Health Incentives and Behavioral Economics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Andrea TroxelDepartment of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
David HuffmanLeonard Davis Institute Center for Health Incentives and Behavioral Economics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Gary D FosterDepartment of Science and Innovation, Weight Watchers International, New York, NY, USA.
Alexis C WojtanowskiDepartment of Science and Innovation, Weight Watchers International, New York, NY, USA.
Kevin G VolppLeonard Davis Institute Center for Health Incentives and Behavioral Economics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
University of Pennsylvania · USDuke University · USNew York University · USTemple University · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USVeterans Health Administration · USWorld Water Watch · US

Funding

A randomized trial of financial incentives for maintenance of weight lossR01AG045045 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI VOLPP, KEVIN G · 2012 to 2017
$1.6M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG045045
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectiveFinancial incentives can improve initial weight loss; we examined whether financial incentives can improve weight loss maintenance. SUBJECTS/

methodsParticipants aged 30-80 years who lost at least 5 kg during the first 4-6 months in a nationally available commercial weight loss program were recruited via the internet into a three-arm randomized trial of two types of financial incentives versus active control during months 1-6 (Phase I) followed by passive monitoring during months 7-12 (Phase II). Interventions were daily self-weighing and text messaging feedback alone (control) or combined with a lottery-based incentive or a direct incentive. The primary outcome was weight change 6 months after initial weight loss. Secondary outcomes included weight change 12 months after initial weight loss (6 months after cessation of maintenance intervention), and self-reported physical activity and eating behaviors.

resultsOf 191 participants randomized, the mean age was 49.0 (SD = 10.5) years and weight loss prior to randomization was 11.4 (4.7) kg; 92% were women and 89% were White. Mean weight changes during the next 6 months (Phase I) were: lottery -3.0 (5.8) kg; direct -2.8 (5.8) kg; and control -1.4 (5.8) kg (all pairwise comparisons p > 0.1). Weight changes through the end of 12 months post-weight loss (Phase II) were: lottery -1.8 (10.5) kg; direct -0.7 (10.7) kg; and control -0.3 (9.4) kg (all pairwise comparisons p > 0.1). The percentages of participants who maintained their weight loss (defined as gaining ≤1.36 kg) were: lottery 79%, direct 76%, and control 67% at 6 months and lottery 66%, direct 62%, and control 59% at 12 months (all pairwise comparisons p > 0.1). At 6 and 12 months after initial weight loss, changes in self-reported physical activity or eating behaviors did not differ across arms.

conclusionsCompared with the active control of daily texting based on daily home weighing, lottery-based and direct monetary incentives provided no additional benefit for weight loss maintenance.

Indexed as

ExerciseFeeding BehaviorHealth BehaviorMotivationWeight LossWeight Reduction ProgramsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansInternetMaleMiddle AgedTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID29795365
PMCPMC5968035
OpenAlexW2807706378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.