ArticleNature2018
Author Correction: The axolotl genome and the evolution of key tissue formation regulators.
Article in Nature, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The genome sequence of the great crested newt,Wellcome open research · 2025Article
- Construction of the axolotl cell landscape using combinatorial hybridization sequencing at single-cell resolution.Nature communications · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum for
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the originally published version of this Article, the sequenced axolotl strain (the homozygous white mutant) was denoted as 'D/D' rather than 'd/d' in Fig. 1a and the accompanying legend, the main text and the Methods section. The original Article has been corrected online.
Identifiers
29795340What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.