Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29795295›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Impact of the griffithsin anti-HIV microbicide and placebo gels on the rectal mucosal proteome and microbiome in non-human primates.

Lauren Girard, Kenzie Birse, Johanna B Holm, Pawel Gajer, Mike S Humphrys, David Garber, Patricia Guenthner, Laura Noël-Romas, Max Abou, Stuart McCorrister and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Sustained-release Griffithsin nanoparticle-fiber composites against HIV-1 and HSV-2 infections.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Potential Use of Marine Seaweeds as Prebiotics: A Review.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Lauren GirardNational HIV and Retrovirology Labs, JC Wilt Infectious Diseases Research Centre, Public Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, Canada.
Kenzie BirseNational HIV and Retrovirology Labs, JC Wilt Infectious Diseases Research Centre, Public Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, Canada.
Johanna B HolmInstitute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.
Pawel GajerInstitute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.
Mike S HumphrysInstitute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.
David GarberLaboratory Branch, Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, National Centre for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, Sexually Transmitted Disease and Tuberculosis Prevention, CDC, Atlanta, USA.
Patricia GuenthnerLaboratory Branch, Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, National Centre for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, Sexually Transmitted Disease and Tuberculosis Prevention, CDC, Atlanta, USA.
Laura Noël-RomasNational HIV and Retrovirology Labs, JC Wilt Infectious Diseases Research Centre, Public Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, Canada.
Max AbouNational HIV and Retrovirology Labs, JC Wilt Infectious Diseases Research Centre, Public Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, Canada.
Stuart McCorristerMass Spectrometry and Proteomics Core Facility, National Microbiology Laboratory, Public Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, Canada.
Garrett WestmacottMass Spectrometry and Proteomics Core Facility, National Microbiology Laboratory, Public Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, Canada.
Lin WangMagee Women's Research Institute, Pittsburgh, USA.
Lisa C RohanMagee Women's Research Institute, Pittsburgh, USA.
Nobuyuki MatobaCenter for Predictive Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, USA.
Janet McNichollLaboratory Branch, Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, National Centre for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, Sexually Transmitted Disease and Tuberculosis Prevention, CDC, Atlanta, USA.
Kenneth E PalmerCenter for Predictive Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, USA.
Jacques RavelInstitute for Genome Sciences, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0851-2233
Adam D BurgenerNational HIV and Retrovirology Labs, JC Wilt Infectious Diseases Research Centre, Public Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, Canada. Adam.Burgener@umanitoba.ca.
Public Health Agency of Canada · CAUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · USNational Center for HIV/AIDS Viral Hepatitis STD and TB Prevention · USUniversity of Louisville · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USKarolinska University Hospital · SE

Funding

Project 3: PREVENT: A first-in-human clinical trial of Griffithsin, an HIV entryU19AI113182 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE · PI BRAND, RHONDA METTER · 2014 to 2018
$14.8M
NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI113182
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Topical microbicides are being explored as an HIV prevention method for individuals who practice receptive anal intercourse. In vivo studies of these microbicides are critical to confirm safety. Here, we evaluated the impact of a rectal microbicide containing the antiviral lectin, Griffithsin (GRFT), on the rectal mucosal proteome and microbiome. Using a randomized, crossover placebo-controlled design, six rhesus macaques received applications of hydroxyethylcellulose (HEC)- or carbopol-formulated 0.1% GRFT gels. Rectal mucosal samples were then evaluated by label-free tandem MS/MS and 16 S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing, for proteomics and microbiome analyses, respectively. Compared to placebo, GRFT gels were not associated with any significant changes to protein levels at any time point (FDR < 5%), but increased abundances of two common and beneficial microbial taxa after 24 hours were observed in HEC-GRFT gel (p < 2E-09). Compared to baseline, both placebo formulations were associated with alterations to proteins involved in proteolysis, activation of the immune response and inflammation after 2 hours (p < 0.0001), and increases in beneficial Faecalibacterium spp. after 24 hours in HEC placebo gel (p = 4.21E-15). This study supports the safety profile of 0.1% GRFT gel as an anti-HIV microbicide and demonstrates that current placebo formulations may associate with changes to rectal proteome and microbiota.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-HIV AgentsAnti-Infective Agents, LocalGelsHIV-1HIV InfectionsHumansMacaca mulattaMicrobiotaMucous MembranePlant LectinsProteomeRectumAnti-HIV AgentsAnti-Infective Agents, LocalGelsgriffithsin protein, GriffithsiaPlant LectinsProteome

Identifiers

PMID29795295
PMCPMC5966460
OpenAlexW2803207333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.