ArticleScientific reports2018
Assessment of Central Visual Function in Patients with Retinitis Pigmentosa.
Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Inflammatory Markers and Disease Progression in Moderate-Stage Retinitis Pigmentosa: Longitudinal Analysis from the Retinitis Pigmentosa Progression and Inflammatory Marker Registry Study.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- Baseline Relationships between Visual Function and Inflammatory Markers in the Registry of Moderated-Stage Retinitis Pigmentosa.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- Clinical characteristics of EYS-associated retinal dystrophy in 291 Japanese patients.NPJ genomic medicine · 2025Article
- Study protocol for a prospective natural history registry investigating the relationships between inflammatory markers and disease progression in retinitis pigmentosa: the RP-PRIMARY study.Japanese journal of ophthalmology · 2025Observational
- Good vision without peripheries: behavioral and fMRI evidence.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Real-world outcomes of voretigene neparvovec treatment in pediatric patients with RPE65-associated Leber congenital amaurosis.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2022Article
- Progression Rate of Visual Function and Affecting Factors at Different Stages of Retinitis Pigmentosa.BioMed research international · 2022Review
- Development and validation of a visual field cluster in retinitis pigmentosa.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Changes of Serum Inflammatory Molecules and Their Relationships with Visual Function in Retinitis Pigmentosa.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2020Article
- Aqueous Flare and Progression of Visual Field Loss in Patients With Retinitis Pigmentosa.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2020Article
- Metabolic and Redox Signaling of the Nucleoredoxin-Like-1 Gene for the Treatment of Genetic Retinal Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- The qualitative assessment of optical coherence tomography and the central retinal sensitivity in patients with retinitis pigmentosa.PloS one · 2020Observational
- Optical Coherence Tomography of Animal Models of Retinitis Pigmentosa: From Animal Studies to Clinical Applications.BioMed research international · 2019Review
- Comparison of Microperimetry and Static Perimetry for Evaluating Macular Function and Progression in Retinitis Pigmentosa.Ophthalmology scienceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In order to clarify the disease progression in retinitis pigmentosa (RP) and its related factors, reliable data on the changes in central visual function in RP are needed. In this longitudinal study, we examined 118 patients who were diagnosed with typical RP. Visual acuity (VA), visual field using a Humphrey Field Analyzer with the central 10-2 SITA-Standard program, and optical coherence tomography measurements were obtained. The slopes, which were derived from serial values of mean deviation (MD), macular sensitivity (MS), or foveal sensitivity (FS) obtained for each eye by a linear mixed model, were used for analysis. MS and FS were calculated as the average retinal sensitivity of 12 and 4 central points respectively. There were statistically significant interactions of times with levels of the central subfield thickness (CST) on the slopes of MS and FS. Compared to the eyes without macular complications, the eyes with macular complications had steeper MD, MS and FS slopes, and this interaction was no significant, but marginal trend for the MS or FS slope (P = 0.10, 0.05, respectively). The central retinal sensitivity (i.e., MS and FS) slopes calculated were effective indices of the progression of central visual function in RP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.