ArticleScientific reports2018
Voting Simulation based Agglomerative Hierarchical Method for Network Community Detection.
Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Community detection has been paid much attention in many fields in recent years, and a great deal of community-detection methods have been proposed. But the time consumption of some of them is heavy, limiting them from being applied to large-scale networks. On the contrary, there exist some lower-time-complexity methods. But most of them are non-deterministic, meaning that running the same method many times may yield different results from the same network, which reduces their practical utility greatly in real-world applications. To solve these problems, we propose a community-detection method in this paper, which takes both the quality of the results and the efficiency of the detecting procedure into account. Moreover, it is a deterministic method which can extract definite community structures from networks. The proposed method is inspired by the voting behaviours in election activities in the social society, in which we first simulate the voting procedure on the network. Every vertex votes for the nominated candidates following the proposed voting principles, densely connected groups of vertices can quickly reach a consensus on their candidates. At the end of this procedure, candidates and their own voters form a group of clusters. Then, we take the clusters as initial communities, and agglomerate some of them into larger ones with high efficiency to obtain the resulting community structures. We conducted extensive experiments on some artificial networks and real-world networks, the experimental results show that our proposed method can efficiently extract high-quality community structures from networks, and outperform the comparison algorithms significantly.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.