Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29794788›Full record

SynthesisMedicine2018

Efficacy and safety of photodynamic therapy for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and human papilloma virus infection: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Wenjia Zhang, Aijia Zhang, Wende Sun, Ying Yue, Hong Li

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Solutions to the Drawbacks of Photothermal and Photodynamic Cancer Therapy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Long Term Effectiveness of Photodynamic Therapy for CIN Treatment.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Wenjia ZhangDepartment of Gynecological Oncology, the First Hospital of Jilin University Changchun University of Traditional Chinese Medicine Zhaoxian Health-center attached to People's Hosptal of Juxian, Rizhao Department of Vascular Surgery, the First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Aijia Zhang
Wende Sun
Ying Yue
Hong Li
Jilin University · CNChangchun University of Chinese Medicine · CNCixian People's Hospital · CNFirst Hospital of Jilin University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe sought to conduct a systemic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials to assess the efficacy and safety of photodynamic therapy (PDT) in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and cervical human papilloma virus (HPV) infection.

methodsThe Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register databases were searched using relevant keywords for entries up to May 1, 2017, irrespective of year of publication. The language was restricted to English. Randomized clinical trials and qualitative studies comparing PDT and placebo for CIN or HPV-positive patients were included. We assessed the evidence quality using a risk of bias graph in RevMan V5.3 and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation scoring system.

resultsOf the 168 studies identified, only 4 RCTs met the inclusion criteria for meta-analysis. In all, 292 and 141 patients received PDT or placebo, respectively. PDT significantly increased the complete remission rate (CRR) among those with CIN (odds ratio [OR]: 2.51 [1.23-5.12]; P = .01) and HPV infection (OR: 3.82 [1.91-7.65]; P = .0002). The adverse events rate (AER) for PDT was greater than that for placebo (OR: 13.32 [4.44, 40.02]; P < .00001). The overall evidence quality was very low. Similarly, in a systematic review including 21 qualitative records, the CRRs for CIN patients with PDT and cervical HPV infection patients with PDT were 82.0% and 77.5%, respectively. The AER for PDT was 31.6%, which was lower than that observed in our meta-analysis (74.6%).

conclusionsPDT that targets CIN or cervical HPV infection improves the CRR, but slightly compromises safety. Further studies are necessary to identify the most effective and least toxic photosensitizer.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPapillomaviridaePapillomavirus InfectionsPhotochemotherapyPhotosensitizing AgentsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeUterine Cervical DysplasiaUterine Cervical NeoplasmsYoung AdultPhotosensitizing Agents

Identifiers

PMID29794788
PMCPMC6392907
OpenAlexW2803147147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.