ArticleJournal of the Royal Army Medical Corps2019
Experimental platforms to study blast injury.
Article in Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Blast and fragmentation injuries associated with cluster munitions in modern warfare: a narrative review.Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2026Review
- Alterations in topology, cost, and dynamics of gamma-band EEG functional networks in a preclinical model of traumatic brain injury.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- Esophageal pressure monitoring and its clinical significance in severe blast lung injury.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Article
- Repetitive, but Not Single, Mild Blast TBI Causes Persistent Neurological Impairments and Selective Cortical Neuronal Loss in Rats.Brain sciences · 2023Article
- Non-Lethal Blasts can Generate Cavitation in Cerebrospinal Fluid While Severe Helmeted Impacts Cannot: A Novel Mechanism for Blast Brain Injury.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Article
- Development of a rodent high-energy blast injury model for investigating conditions associated with traumatic amputations.Bone & joint research · 2021Article
- Defining and Managing Pain in Stroke and Traumatic Brain Injury Research.Comparative medicine · 2019Review
- Restricting Lower Limb Flail is Key to Preventing Fatal Pelvic Blast Injury.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2019Article
- Improving survivability from blast injury: 'shifting the goalposts' and the need for interdisciplinary research.Journal of the Royal Army Medical Corps · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Injuries sustained due to attacks from explosive weapons are multiple in number, complex in nature, and not well characterised. Blast may cause damage to the human body by the direct effect of overpressure, penetration by highly energised fragments, and blunt trauma by violent displacements of the body. The ability to reproduce the injuries of such insults in a well-controlled fashion is essential in order to understand fully the unique mechanism by which they occur, and design better treatment and protection strategies to alleviate the resulting poor long-term outcomes. This paper reports a range of experimental platforms that have been developed for different blast injury models, their working mechanism, and main applications. These platforms include the shock tube, split-Hopkinson bars, the gas gun, drop towers and bespoke underbody blast simulators.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.