Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29794093›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2018

Exploring emergency department 4-hour target performance and cancelled elective operations: a regression analysis of routinely collected and openly reported NHS trust data.

Brad Keogh, David Culliford, Richard Guerrero-Ludueña, Thomas Monks

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Why are there long waits at English emergency departments?The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Brad KeoghNIHR CLAHRC Wessex, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2960-0918
David CullifordNIHR CLAHRC Wessex, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Richard Guerrero-LudueñaWessex AHSN CIS, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1217-015X
Thomas MonksNIHR CLAHRC Wessex, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2631-4481

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo quantify the effect of intrahospital patient flow on emergency department (ED) performance targets and indicate if the expectations set by the National Health Service (NHS) England 5-year forward review are realistic in returning emergency services to previous performance levels.

designLinear regression analysis of routinely reported trust activity and performance data using a series of cross-sectional studies.

settingNHS trusts in England submitting routine nationally reported measures to NHS England.

participants142 acute non-specialist trusts operating in England between 2012 and 2016.

main outcome measuresThe primary outcome measures were proportion of 4-hour waiting time breaches and cancelled elective operations.

methodsUnivariate and multivariate linear regression models were used to show relationships between the outcome measures and various measures of trust activity including empty day beds, empty night beds, day bed to night bed ratio, ED conversion ratio and delayed transfers of care.

resultsUnivariate regression results using the outcome of 4-hour breaches showed clear relationships with empty night beds and ED conversion ratio between 2012 and 2016. The day bed to night bed ratio showed an increasing ability to explain variation in performance between 2015 and 2016. Delayed transfers of care showed little evidence of an association. Multivariate model results indicated that the ability of patient flow variables to explain 4-hour target performance had reduced between 2012 and 2016 (19% to 12%), and had increased in explaining cancelled elective operations (7% to 17%).

conclusionsThe flow of patients through trusts is shown to influence ED performance; however, performance has become less explainable by intratrust patient flow between 2012 and 2016. Some commonly stated explanatory factors such as delayed transfers of care showed limited evidence of being related. The results indicate some of the measures proposed by NHS England to reduce pressure on EDs may not have the desired impact on returning services to previous performance levels.

Indexed as

BedsHospitalsWaiting ListsWorkloadCross-Sectional StudiesElective Surgical ProceduresEmergency Service, HospitalEnglandFemaleHospitalizationHumansLinear ModelsMaleMultivariate AnalysisPatient TransferRegression Analysis4 hour targetfive year forward viewperformance target

Identifiers

PMID29794093
PMCPMC5988090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.