Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29794049›Full record

ReviewProceedings. Biological sciences2018

Magnetocarcinogenesis: is there a mechanism for carcinogenic effects of weak magnetic fields?

Jukka Juutilainen, Mikko Herrala, Jukka Luukkonen, Jonne Naarala, P J Hore

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Magneto-oncology: a radical pair primer.Frontiers in oncology · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. How the Geomagnetic Field Influences Life on Earth - An Integrated Approach to Geomagnetobiology.Origins of life and evolution of the biosphere : the journal of the International Society for the Study of the Origin of Life · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Cellular autofluorescence is magnetic field sensitive.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Weak radiofrequency fields affect the insect circadian clock.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jukka JuutilainenDepartment of Environmental and Biological Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland jukka.juutilainen@uef.fi.ORCID 0000-0002-9578-7381
Mikko HerralaDepartment of Environmental and Biological Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Jukka LuukkonenDepartment of Environmental and Biological Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Jonne NaaralaDepartment of Environmental and Biological Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-5240-968X
P J HoreDepartment of Chemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8863-570X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extremely low-frequency (ELF) magnetic fields have been classified as possibly carcinogenic, mainly based on rather consistent epidemiological findings suggesting a link between childhood leukaemia and 50-60 Hz magnetic fields from power lines. However, causality is not the only possible explanation for the epidemiological associations, as animal and

Indexed as

BirdsCarcinogenesisAnimalsCryptochromesHumansMagnetic FieldsNeoplasmsCryptochromescancercryptochromeELF magnetic fieldsgenomic instabilityradical pair mechanism

Identifiers

PMID29794049
PMCPMC5998098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.