Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29794033›Full record

ReviewOpen biology2018

Prediction of response to drug therapy in psychiatric disorders.

Shani Stern, Sara Linker, Krishna C Vadodaria, Maria C Marchetto, Fred H Gage

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Open biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Mental Health Applications of Generative AI and Large Language Modeling in the United States.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Potential Candidates for Biomarkers in Bipolar Disorder: A Proteomic Approach through Systems Biology.Clinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2022
    Review
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Contrasting Typical and Atypical Antipsychotic Drugs.Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing) · 2021
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shani SternLaboratory of Genetics, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA sstern@salk.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-2644-7068
Sara LinkerLaboratory of Genetics, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.
Krishna C VadodariaLaboratory of Genetics, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.
Maria C MarchettoLaboratory of Genetics, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.
Fred H GageLaboratory of Genetics, Salk Institute for Biological Studies, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA gage@salk.edu.

Funding

Role of CACNA1C - a shared risk gene in neuropsychiatric disordersU19MH106434 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GAGE, FRED H · 2016 to 2020
$13.8M
Single-Cell Approaches to Reveal How Jumping Genes Individualize Neural CircuitsR01MH095741 · NIMH · SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES · PI GAGE, FRED H · 2011 to 2015
$6.5M
NIH HHS R01 MH095741NIH HHS U19MH106434NIMH NIH HHS U19 MH106434
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Personalized medicine has become increasingly relevant to many medical fields, promising more efficient drug therapies and earlier intervention. The development of personalized medicine is coupled with the identification of biomarkers and classification algorithms that help predict the responses of different patients to different drugs. In the last 10 years, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved several genetically pre-screened drugs labelled as pharmacogenomics in the fields of oncology, pulmonary medicine, gastroenterology, haematology, neurology, rheumatology and even psychiatry. Clinicians have long cautioned that what may appear to be similar patient-reported symptoms may actually arise from different biological causes. With growing populations being diagnosed with different psychiatric conditions, it is critical for scientists and clinicians to develop precision medication tailored to individual conditions. Genome-wide association studies have highlighted the complicated nature of psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, major depression and autism spectrum disorder. Following these studies, association studies are needed to look for genomic markers of responsiveness to available drugs of individual patients within the population of a specific disorder. In addition to GWAS, the advent of new technologies such as brain imaging, cell reprogramming, sequencing and gene editing has given us the opportunity to look for more biomarkers that characterize a therapeutic response to a drug and to use all these biomarkers for determining treatment options. In this review, we discuss studies that were performed to find biomarkers of responsiveness to different available drugs for four brain disorders: bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, major depression and autism spectrum disorder. We provide recommendations for using an integrated method that will use available techniques for a better prediction of the most suitable drug.

Indexed as

Genetic MarkersPharmacogenomic VariantsAntipsychotic AgentsAutism Spectrum DisorderBipolar DisorderClinical Trials as TopicHumansMajor Depressive DisorderMental DisordersPharmacogeneticsPrecision MedicineSchizophreniaAntipsychotic AgentsGenetic Markersautism spectrum disorderbipolar disorderclassificationmajor depressionpredictionschizophrenia

Identifiers

PMID29794033
PMCPMC5990649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.