ArticleMicrobiome2018
Gut microbes contribute to variation in solid organ transplant outcomes in mice.
Article in Microbiome, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
48 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.
- The gut microbiome and allograft outcomes: implications for heart transplantation.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2026Review
- The gut microbiome in solid-organ and haematopoietic-stem-cell transplantation.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2026Review
- Oral GAD65-Microorganisms · 2026Article
- Ocular Surface Microbiota and Corneal Transplant Outcome: Is There a Link?Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Delivery of butyrate to the lower gut by polymeric micelles prolongs survival of distal skin allografts.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2025Article
- Gut microbiota modulation in cardiac cell therapy with immunosuppression in a nonhuman primate ischemia/reperfusion model.NPJ Regenerative medicine · 2025Article
- Gut Microbiota and Metabolite Changes Induced by Tacrolimus: Implications for Skin Transplant Immunology in Mice.Journal of inflammation research · 2025Article
- Causal associations between gutFuture microbiology · 2025Article
- Gut Microbial Dysbiosis and Implications in Solid Organ Transplantation.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- The Gut Microbiome and Symptom Burden After Kidney Transplantation: An Overview and Research Opportunities.Biological research for nursing · 2024Review
- A systematic framework for understanding the microbiome in human health and disease: from basic principles to clinical translation.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2024Review
- Coordinated elimination of bacterial taxa optimally attenuates alloimmunity and prolongs allograft survival.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2024Article
- Gut Microbiome and Metabolome Modulation by High-Hydrostatic-Pressure-Processed Tomato Juice.Nutrients · 2024Article
- The Microbiome and Pediatric Transplantation.Journal of the Pediatric Infectious Diseases Society · 2024Review
- Interaction between ischemia-reperfusion injury and intestinal microecology in organ transplantation and its therapeutic prospects.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
- Skin and gut microbial associations with squamous cell carcinoma in solid organ transplant recipients.Archives of dermatological research · 2023Article
- Microbiota-dependent and -independent effects of obesity on transplant rejection and hyperglycemia.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2023Article
- Intestinal microbiota links to allograft stability after lung transplantation: a prospective cohort study.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2023Article
- Gut Microbiome in Patients after Heart Transplantation-Current State of Knowledge.Biomedicines · 2023Review
- Oral administration of the commensal Alistipes onderdonkii prolongs allograft survival.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSolid organ transplant recipients show heterogeneity in the occurrence and timing of acute rejection episodes. Understanding the factors responsible for such variability in patient outcomes may lead to improved diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. Rejection kinetics of transplanted organs mainly depends on the extent of genetic disparities between donor and recipient, but a role for environmental factors is emerging. We have recently shown that major alterations of the microbiota following broad-spectrum antibiotics, or use of germ-free animals, promoted longer skin graft survival in mice. Here, we tested whether spontaneous differences in microbial colonization between genetically similar individuals can contribute to variability in graft rejection kinetics.
resultsWe compared rejection kinetics of minor mismatched skin grafts in C57BL/6 mice from Jackson Laboratory (Jax) and Taconic Farms (Tac), genetically similar animals colonized by different commensal microbes. Female Tac mice rejected skin grafts from vendor-matched males more quickly than Jax mice. We observed prolonged graft survival in Tac mice when they were exposed to Jax mice microbiome through co-housing or fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) by gastric gavage. In contrast, exposure to Tac mice did not change graft rejection kinetics in Jax mice, suggesting a dominant suppressive effect of Jax microbiota. High-throughput sequencing of 16S rRNA gene amplicons from Jax and Tac mice fecal samples confirmed a convergence of microbiota composition after cohousing or fecal transfer. Our analysis of amplicon data associated members of a single bacterial genus, Alistipes, with prolonged graft survival. Consistent with this finding, members of the genus Alistipes were absent in a separate Tac cohort, in which fecal transfer from Jax mice failed to prolong graft survival.
conclusionsThese results demonstrate that differences in resident microbiome in healthy individuals may translate into distinct kinetics of graft rejection, and contribute to interpersonal variability in graft outcomes. The association between Alistipes and prolonged skin graft survival in mice suggests that members of this genus might affect host physiology, including at sites distal to the gastrointestinal tract. Overall, these findings allude to a potential therapeutic role for specific gut microbes to promote graft survival through the administration of probiotics, or FMT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.