ArticleSystematic reviews2018
Older adult's experience of chronic low back pain and its implications on their daily life: Study protocol of a systematic review of qualitative research.
Article in Systematic reviews, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Lidocaine for postoperative pain after cardiac surgery: a systematic review.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2021Pooled it
- Article
- Physical function, daily activities, and spinal pain in the elderly: A cross-sectional study.PloS one · 2026Article
- Re-Examining the Dimensionality of a Disability Assessment Tool Using Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling (ESEM): A Preliminary Study in Low Back Pain.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Factors associated with nonpharmacological treatment use among older adults with chronic low back pain tapering opioids.Pain management · 2025Article
- Lived Experiences of Older Adults With Chronic Low Back Pain and Implications on Their Daily Life: A Metasynthesis of Qualitative Research.Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation · 2025Review
- Low Back Pain Presentation and Management at the Emergency Department: Differences Between Older Adults Residing in the Community and Aged Care Homes.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2025Observational
- A Comparison of Analgesic Efficacy of Triamcinolone vs Magnesium Sulfate as Adjuvants in Caudal Block in Patients with Low Back Pain: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial.Anesthesiology and pain medicine · 2024Article
- Impact of Insurance Type on Access to Pain Management Specialists for the Treatment of Lower Back Pain.Cureus · 2024Article
- Kinesiophobia, limits of stability, and functional balance assessment in geriatric patients with chronic low back pain and osteoporosis: a comprehensive study.Frontiers in neurology · 2024Article
- Avoidance-Endurance Model in Older Black Men with Low Back Pain: Exploring Relationships.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2023Article
- Challenges, Concerns, and Experiences of Community-Dwelling Older Women with Chronic Low Back Pain-A Qualitative Study in Hong Kong, China.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Virtual reality: a promising non-pharmacological modality for chronic low back pain management in elderly.The Korean journal of pain · 2022Article
- Experiences of community-dwelling older adults with chronic low back pain in Hong Kong and Switzerland - A qualitative study.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2022Article
- Electromyography and Therapeutic Response to Lumbosacral Epidural Steroid Injections: A Systematic Review.Journal of pain research · 2021Review
- Article
- Global Consensus From Clinicians Regarding Low Back Pain Outcome Indicators for Older Adults: Pairwise Wiki Survey Using Crowdsourcing.JMIR rehabilitation and assistive technologies · 2019Article
- Children and young people's experiences of living with developmental coordination disorder/dyspraxia: study protocol for a qualitative evidence synthesis.HRB open research · 2019Article
- Characteristics of physicians who prescribe opioids for chronic pain: a meta-narrative systematic review.Journal of pain research · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOf various chronic diseases, low back pain (LBP) is the most common and debilitating musculoskeletal condition among older adults aged 65 years or older. While more than 17 million older adults in the USA suffer from at least one episode of LBP annually, approximately six million of them experience chronic LBP that significantly affects their quality of life and physical function. Since many older adults with chronic LBP may also have comorbidities and are more sensitive to pain than younger counterparts, these older individuals may face unique age-related physical and psychosocial problems. While some qualitative research studies have investigated the life experiences of older adults with chronic LBP, no systematic review has integrated and synthesized the scientific knowledge regarding the influence of chronic LBP on the physical, psychological, and social aspects of lives in older adults. Without such information, it may result in unmet care needs and ineffective interventions for this vulnerable group. Therefore, the objective of this systematic review is to synthesize knowledge regarding older adults' experiences of living with chronic LBP and the implications on their daily lives. METHODS/
designCandidate publications will be sought from databases: PubMed, CINAHL, and PsycINFO. Qualitative research studies will be included if they are related to the experiences of older adults with chronic LBP. Two independent reviewers will screen the titles, abstracts, and full-text articles for eligibility. The reference lists of the included studies will be checked for additional relevant studies. Forward citation tracking will be conducted. Meta-ethnography will be chosen to synthesize the data from the included studies. Specifically, the second-order concepts that are deemed to be translatable by two independent reviewers will be included and synthesized to capture the core of the idiomatic translations (i.e., a translation focusing on salient categories of meaning rather than the literal translation of words or phrases). DISCUSSION: This systematic review of qualitative evidence will enable researchers to identify potential unmet care needs, as well as to facilitate the development of effective, appropriate, person-centered health care interventions targeting this group of individuals. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO 2018: CRD42018091292.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.