ArticleBMC pulmonary medicine2018
Effect of altering breathing frequency on maximum voluntary ventilation in healthy adults.
Article in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neural respiratory drive during maximal voluntary ventilation in individuals with hypertension: A case-control study.PloS one · 2024Article
- Lung Function and Respiratory Muscle Adaptations of Endurance- and Strength-Trained Males.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Acute effects of high-volume compared to low-volume resistance exercise on lung function.Journal of exercise rehabilitation · 2020Article
- Maximal Voluntary Ventilation Should Not Be Estimated From the Forced Expiratory Volume in the First Second in Healthy People and COPD Patients.Frontiers in physiology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCompared to other pulmonary function tests, there is a lack of standardization regarding how a maximum voluntary ventilation (MVV) maneuver is performed. Specifically, little is known about the variation in breathing frequency (f
methodsTen participants performed MVV maneuvers at various f
resultsA third-order polynomial regression analysis showed that MVV = - 0.0001(f
conclusionsThis study demonstrates the shortcomings of the current lack of standardization in MVV testing and establishes data-driven recommendations for optimal f
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.