Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29793440›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2018

Using high throughput microtissue culture to study the difference in prostate cancer cell behavior and drug response in 2D and 3D co-cultures.

Eman Mosaad, Karen Chambers, Kathryn Futrega, Judith Clements, Michael Robert Doran

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Roles of non-coding RNAs in intercellular crosstalk in cardiovascular diseases.The Korean journal of physiology & pharmacology : official journal of the Korean Physiological Society and the Korean Society of Pharmacology · 2023
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Eman MosaadStem Cell Therapies Laboratory, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Translational Research Institute (TRI), 37 Kent Street, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Karen ChambersQuadram Institute Bioscience, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, UK.
Kathryn FutregaStem Cell Therapies Laboratory, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Translational Research Institute (TRI), 37 Kent Street, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Judith ClementsAustralian Prostate Cancer Research Centre - Queensland (APCRC-Q), Translational Research Institute (TRI), Brisbane, Australia.
Michael Robert DoranStem Cell Therapies Laboratory, Queensland University of Technology (QUT), Translational Research Institute (TRI), 37 Kent Street, Brisbane, QLD, Australia. michael.doran@qut.edu.au.
Translational Research Institute · AUQuadram Institute · GBQueensland University of Technology · AU

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council APP1108043National Health and Medical Research Council APP1130013
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is increasing appreciation that non-cancer cells within the tumour microenvironment influence cancer progression and anti-cancer drug efficacy. For metastatic prostate cancer (PCa), the bone marrow microenvironment influences metastasis, drug response, and possibly drug resistance.

methodsUsing a novel microwell platform, the Microwell-mesh, we manufactured hundreds of 3D co-culture microtissues formed from PCa cells and bone marrow stromal cells. We used luciferase-expressing C42B PCa cells to enable quantification of the number of PCa cells in complex microtissue co-cultures. This strategy enabled us to quantify specific PCa cell growth and death in response to drug treatment, in different co-culture conditions. In parallel, we used Transwell migration assays to characterize PCa cell migration towards different 2D and 3D stromal cell populations.

resultsOur results reveal that PCa cell migration varied depending on the relative aggressiveness of the PCa cell lines, the stromal cell composition, and stromal cell 2D or 3D geometry. We found that C42B cell sensitivity to Docetaxel varied depending on culture geometry, and the presence or absence of different stromal cell populations. By contrast, the C42B cell response to Abiraterone Acetate was dependent on geometry, but not on the presence or absence of stromal cells.

conclusionIn summary, stromal cell composition and geometry influences PCa cell migration, growth and drug response. The Microwell-mesh and microtissues are powerful tools to study these complex 3D interactions.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBone Marrow CellsCell Culture TechniquesCell Line, TumorCell MovementCell ProliferationCoculture TechniquesDocetaxelDrug Screening Assays, AntitumorFeasibility StudiesHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysHumansMaleProstateProstatic NeoplasmsStromal CellsAntineoplastic AgentsDocetaxel3D cultureBone marrow stromal cellsCo-cultureMicrowell-mesh platformProstate cancer

Identifiers

PMID29793440
PMCPMC5968610
OpenAlexW2805250506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.