ReviewThe American psychologist
Interdisciplinary team science and the public: Steps toward a participatory team science.
Review in The American psychologist. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Self-injurious thoughts and behaviors and alterations in positive valence systems: A systematic review of the literature.Journal of psychiatric research · 2022Pooled it
- Systems Measures of a Trauma-Informed Approach: A Systematic Review.American journal of community psychology · 2019Pooled it
- Team science: Progress, barriers, and pathways forward.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- COVID-19 response and the unhoused communities in Sacramento: a mixed methods study with policy implications.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Experimental Therapeutics: Opportunities and Challenges Stemming From the National Institute of Mental Health Workshop on Novel Target Discovery and Psychosocial Intervention Development.Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2025Article
- Building capacity in patient-oriented research: reflections on cultivating relationships within a high-secure forensic mental health hospital.Research involvement and engagement · 2025Article
- Conference proceedings for the 2025 Design for Implementation: The Future of Trauma Research and Clinical Guidance Conference Series.Trauma surgery & acute care open · 2025Article
- Article
- Toward a multi-level approach to the study of the intergenerational transmission of trauma: Current findings and future directions.Development and psychopathology · 2024Review
- The Genesis of Multidisciplinary Health Professionals Teams for Pain Management. A History from the Hellenic Antiquity to Modern Palliative Medicine.Acta medica academica · 2024Article
- Exploring patient and caregiver perceptions of the meaning of the patient partner role: a qualitative study.Research involvement and engagement · 2023Article
- An equitable, community-engaged translational framework for science in human lactation and infant feeding-a report from "Breastmilk Ecology: Genesis of Infant Nutrition (BEGIN)" Working Group 5.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2023Article
- Connect: Cultivating Academic-Community Partnerships to Address Our Communities' Complex Needs During Public Health Crises.Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action · 2023Article
- Integrative approaches to methods training for early-career scientists: Rationale and process evaluation of the first cohort of the Michigan Integrative Well-Being and Inequality Training Program.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2023Article
- Medical Device Development from Ideation to Regulation and Technology Transfer in Low- and Middle-income Countries.Acta medica Philippina · 2023Article
- Editorial: Experts' opinions on aging and public health.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Validation of the Novel Interprofessional Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire to Facilitate Multidisciplinary Team Building in Patient-Centered Care.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Impact of a CBPR-informed physical activity intervention before and during COVID-19 among women from a disadvantaged neighborhood in Sweden.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Implementing an evidence-based competency model for science team training and evaluation: TeamMAPPS.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2021Article
- Assessing the application of human-centered design to translational research.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Interdisciplinary team science involves research collaboration among investigators from different disciplines who work interdependently to share leadership and responsibility. Although over the past several decades there has been an increase in knowledge produced by science teams, the public has not been meaningfully engaged in this process. We argue that contemporary changes in how science is understood and practiced offer an opportunity to reconsider engaging the public as active participants on teams and coin the term participatory team science to describe public engagement in team science. We discuss how public engagement can enhance knowledge within the team to address complex problems and suggest a different organizing framework for team science that aligns better with how teams operate and with participatory approaches to research. We also summarize work on public engagement in science, describe opportunities for various types of engagement, and provide an example of participatory team science carried out across research phases. We conclude by discussing implications of participatory team science for psychology, including changing the default when assembling an interdisciplinary science team by identifying meaningful roles for public engagement through participatory team science. (PsycINFO Database Record
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.